SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (42763)4/15/2004 10:41:56 AM
From: T L Comiskey  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Jobless Claims Rise More Than Expected



WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of Americans filing initial claims for jobless aid rose a sharper than expected 30,000 last week, the biggest jump in over a year, according to a government report on Thursday that could temper budding enthusiasm over a U.S. labor market revival.







First-time claims for state unemployment benefits climbed to 360,000 in the week ended April 10, their highest level since early February, from a revised 330,000 in the prior week, the Labor Department (news - web sites) said.

The increase in initial claims was the largest weekly rise since December 2002.

Wall Street economists had expected claims to rise to only 335,000 from the more than three-year low reached in the previous week.

A Labor Department analyst cautioned, however, that the first full week of April was "pretty unpredictable" and difficult to adjust for seasonal variations. Still, he said there were no special factors to explain the jump in claims.

A four-week average of initial claims, which irons out weekly volatility, moved up by 6,750 to 344,250 - a level economists would normally associate with rising levels of employment.

The department said earlier this month that U.S. employers added 308,000 workers to their payrolls in March, the biggest increase in four years.

The jump in employment came as welcome news for an economy that had been mired in a sluggish job recovery and helped fuel expectations interest rates would soon head higher.

In the claims report, the department said the overall number of people on the benefit rolls who had already received an initial week of aid dropped 22,000 last week to 2.98 million, the lowest level since July 2001.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (42763)4/15/2004 12:09:51 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 89467
 
Bush DEFLECTS QUESTIONS ABOUT THE HANDOFF OF POWER (THE most important question of the conference)....and HANDS off the question to Brahimi (WHO NO ONE HAS REALLY HEARD OF).....
and NOW! Brahimi is DISSING BUSH'S HANDLING OF THE ENTIRE FALLOUJA DEBACLE!......
Problem is....THERE WILL BE NO TRANSFER OF POWER!...only SOVEREIGNTY....which is MEANINGLESS....
the US will STILL BE IN POWER

U.N. Envoy Sees Hope Amid Trouble for Iraq
Despite criticizing U.S. military policies, he says he envisions an interim government by June 30.

By Alissa J. Rubin, Times Staff Writer

BAGHDAD — U.N. Special Representative Lakhdar Brahimi on
Wednesday sharply criticized U.S. military tactics in Iraq but said it was still
possible for an interim Iraqi government to be formed by June 30, when the
U.S. plans to return sovereignty to the strife-torn nation.


Brahimi, commenting as he concluded an 11-day visit to Iraq, said he would
make recommendations to U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, including a
proposal for forming an interim government and terminating the
U.S.-appointed Iraqi Governing Council at the end of June.

The interim government, he said,
would be made up of a prime
minister, who would lead the
Cabinet, and a president and two
vice presidents. It is widely assumed
that the president would be a Shiite
Muslim, because Shiites compose the
majority population in Iraq. The vice
presidents probably would be a
Sunni Muslim and an ethnic Kurd.

But, Brahimi added, "considerable"
improvement in security would be
necessary for national elections to be
held as scheduled in January.

Brahimi's visit came during the most
violent period since the major combat
phase of the war was declared over
by President Bush last May. Bush,
during a rare news conference Tuesday, insisted that plans for
the June 30 sovereignty hand-over remained in place even
though it was not yet clear how the transition would occur or
who would take over. "We'll find that out soon," Bush said.
"That's what Mr. Brahimi is doing."

Brahimi's comments on the transition were well received Wednesday by U.S. officials, including L. Paul
Bremer III, the U.S. civilian administrator for Iraq. But the plan still might face opposition from
members of the Governing Council, who would find themselves without senior positions in the new
order.

Bremer did not comment on Brahimi's criticisms of U.S. military policies.

The United Nations envoy took issue with American military assaults on the Sunni Triangle town of
Fallouja and the U.S. practice of unlimited detention of Iraqis suspected of engaging in hostile activities.

"I would like to renew here the expression of my deep sorrow for the loss of life and the destruction
that has befallen Fallouja, parts of Baghdad and other places up and down the country," Brahimi told a
news conference in Baghdad.

"The collective punishments are not acceptable, cannot be acceptable, and to cordon off and besiege a
city is not acceptable," he said. "There is no military solution to the problems and … the use of force,
especially of excessive use of force, makes matters worse."

In addition to Fallouja, Brahimi was referring to military operations targeting Shiite cleric Muqtada Sadr
and his militia. U.S. forces have threatened to use force in Najaf, a holy city south of Baghdad where
Sadr has taken refuge.


Whether Brahimi's criticisms will have an effect here is far from clear. Both U.S. and insurgent forces
have deeply entrenched positions, but neither may want to alienate the United Nations, an organization
that both sides might find advantageous to work with over the long term.

Negotiations between mediators and anti-American factions continued Wednesday in Fallouja and
Najaf, with some apparent movement in the latter. Sadr agreed to drop some conditions for talks, as
Iranian negotiators arrived in Iraq, joining the effort to avert a U.S. attack on Najaf.

Fighting nationwide since the beginning of April has left more than 80 U.S. troops and more than 700
Iraqis dead, according to U.S. military figures.

Violence across Iraq continued Wednesday with the abduction of two more Japanese citizens,
according to a statement by the Japanese foreign minister, who was in Amman, the Jordanian capital,
negotiating for the hostages' release.

Also late Wednesday, the Al Jazeera satellite TV channel announced that one of four Italian hostages
held by an Iraqi group had been killed. Al Jazeera said footage of the killing was too gruesome to air.
Afterward, Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi quickly promised to keep his troops in Iraq.


Most of the hostages seized in Iraq have been taken in the Sunni-dominated area between Baghdad
and the Jordanian border.

In Fallouja, hopes for a peaceful solution were in short supply Wednesday. There were periods of
heavy weapons fire between Marines and insurgents.

Marines cordoned off Fallouja and entered the city 35 miles west of Baghdad about 10 days ago after
four U.S. civilian contractors were ambushed, slain and mutilated there. The result has been a series of
battles with insurgents who often hid among civilians, the military said, although in recent days there has
been a patchy cease-fire.

Hachim Hassani, an acting Iraqi Governing Council member who is mediating between leading Fallouja
officials and the U.S. military, said he was increasingly nervous about the fate of the cease-fire, even
after an eight-hour meeting between the two sides. He said he was worried that the U.S. authorities
were holding the meetings only so they could say "we tried to find a political solution but we couldn't."

In Baghdad, Brahimi said that the interim government he was proposing would also include the
formation of an interim national assembly, which would have consultative powers but no legislative role,
because "you don't need a legislative assembly for such a short period."

The assembly, he said, would be chosen by a national conference that would be convened in July.
Brahimi called such a conference "indispensable" in Iraq, where "for 30 years, [people] were afraid to
talk in front of their children."

The proposals would need to be approved by Bremer and the Governing Council, which had been
seeking to perpetuate itself until next year's planned national elections.

Bremer said the United States welcomed Brahimi's proposals and indicated that the U.N.'s role was
crucial to Iraq's political development. He noted that the envoy's visit and the work of the U.N. election
team had been "highly constructive."

The positive response was not surprising, since Bremer has said often that an interim government
should be "technocratic" and untainted by politics

Brahimi said the U.S. policies to disband the Iraqi army, force members of Saddam Hussein's Baath
Party out of government and hold detainees indefinitely had caused "grievances that need to be
addressed."

"It is difficult to understand that thousands upon thousands of teachers, university professors, medical
doctors and hospital staff, engineers and other professionals who are sorely needed have been
dismissed within the de-Baathification process, and so far many of those cases have yet to be
reviewed," he said.

Brahimi added that the unlimited detention of Iraqi suspects should be remedied "now."

He did not mince words about the strained relationship over the last year between the U.N. and the
United States.

"We disagree from time to time…. Now, the United States disagrees also with other members of the
United Nations, and I am sure you don't need to be reminded that some of those disagreements took
place in relations to Iraq not very long ago," he said. He described the U.N. leadership as "reasonably
satisfied" with its present relationship with the United States.

In Najaf, a widening circle of Shiite leaders attempted to play a role in mediating between the U.S.-led
Coalition Provisional Authority and Sadr, prompted in large part by the fear that U.S. troops might
storm into the holy city. Such action would almost certainly set off uncontrollable mass demonstrations
and violence across the country.

Occupation officials are demanding that Sadr appear before an Iraqi judge for questioning in the killing
last year of rival cleric Abdul Majid Khoei and that he disband his several-thousand-strong militia.
About 2,500 U.S. troops are in the vicinity of Najaf, and commanding officers have said they are on a
mission "to capture or kill" him.

An aide to Sadr announced Wednesday that the cleric was dropping his demand that U.S. forces
withdraw from Iraq's major cities and that the coalition authority release all prisoners associated with
his militia or his other activities — including some held in the Khoei case.

Whether the announcement was substantive or merely a bargaining tactic was difficult to tell. U.S.
military commanders near Najaf said they observed Sadr's forces fortifying their positions atop
buildings and bridges.

In recent days, U.S. military officials have made preparations for mass arrests. They have completed
construction near Najaf of a detention facility — larger than four football fields — to hold anticipated
prisoners. But early today, U.S. forces were told that all planned raids and missions around Najaf were
being suspended indefinitely.