Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (15094)	4/15/2004 11:13:19 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Clarke is a Republican. He is not a partisan. He is a counter-terrorism expert who saw what everyone else now knows and what Bush admitted to Bob Woodward, that he was AWOL on terror before 9-11. That is a simple fact. You show me one speech from any top Bushie mentioning terrorism prior to 9-11. Bush, Cheney, Ahscroft, Rice, Rumsfeld, none of them even mentioned it once that I have ever heard of. So quit arguing. Just accept the fact. Bush was AWOl on terror and Clarke was simply stating the obvious.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (15094)	4/16/2004 12:25:57 AM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

What about Cheney's stock options? He lied about those didn't he? And what about Halliburton's no-bid contract to practically run the war in Iraq, double-billing us for everything along the way. Finally, where are the Iraqi oil revenues going? At his press conference Bush said the Iraqi oil revnues were great and would benefit the Iraqi people "in the future". But where are they going now? Why aren't they being used to pay for the frigging war? And what kind of cut off the top is Halliburton getting for the crude?