SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (39781)4/16/2004 12:46:18 PM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793841
 
George? Jamie. We have to stop meeting like this! She is "toast."



DEEPER CIA LINK BY 9/11 PANELIST

By BRIAN BLOMQUIST

April 16, 2004 -- WASHINGTON - New questions surfaced yesterday about 9/11 commissioner Jamie Gorelick's potential conflicts of interest after it was revealed she was more deeply involved in anti-terror efforts than has previously been known.
Records obtained by The Post show that Gorelick, while serving in a top job at the Justice Department, met every two weeks with George Tenet, then the No. 2 official at the CIA, and headed then-Attorney General Janet Reno's national-security team.

Gorelick's own description of her counter-terrorism duties under Bill Clinton is contained in testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee in 1995.

But they are not mentioned in her official biography on the 9/11 commission Web site.

Gorelick is already facing calls for her resignation after it was learned she penned a Justice Department memo that some officials say hindered the fight against terrorism by limiting information-sharing by agencies.

In the 9/11 hearings, Gorelick recused herself only from questioning Reno, her former boss, but she was active in grilling Tenet and several other top CIA officials who were all at the agency when Gorelick was the chief liaison between the CIA and the Justice Department.

Asked whether her role in the Justice Department posed a conflict of interest for Gorelick - who is scrutinizing the terror policies under Clinton and Bush - a 9/11 commission official responded, "She was appointed by Sen. [Tom] Daschle. We didn't do the vetting. He did."



House Judiciary Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.) has asked Gorelick to step down based on her memo defending the so-called "wall" separating law-enforcement investigators and intelligence operatives.

Gorelick didn't return a phone call for comment.


NEW YORK POST



To: JohnM who wrote (39781)4/16/2004 12:49:00 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793841
 
Klien is running with your budget philosophy, John. Of course, the oppo here is just as far off base with the attitude of "blame the parents."

More Money for Schools Won’t Buy Good Results

ALICIA COLON acolon@nysun.com

Schools Chancellor Joel Klein has delivered an ultimatum to state lawmakers: Give the city schools billions of dollars in additional aid or he’ll take them to court. Hmmm.

Billions of dollars more will bring the total budget to $14.2 billion.That’s roughly enough to send every public school student to private school, and Johnny still can’t read.

New York City has one of the largest budgets and yet its schools still perform below average. You’d think by now someone would consider the fact that throwing good money after bad is not the answer.

Howard Hurwitz was an educator for more than 40 years. He was a principal for 11 years and earned his doctorate degree at Columbia University with a thesis on Theodore Roosevelt, and is the author of 12 books.

He insists throwing money at the schools is not the answer when the home environment of many of the students overshadows what they can learn in the school. The high rate of Hispanic and black students makes it an especially difficult task, he says, but the students are educable.

Through the past decades the system has also suffered from the decline of good teachers. For many years, Mr. Hurwitz said, teachers had to pass stiff exams before they could be certified. That’s no longer the case. “The unions are directly responsible for keeping incompetent teachers within the school system,” he said.

Professor Joan Callahan was a special-education teacher for 10 years, spent 15 as an education evaluator, and just retired after teaching special education at St. John’s University.

She had plenty to say: “First of all, if you took every cent in this country and poured it into the schools it wouldn’t make a sou’s worth of difference, unless the home lives and parents begin to pour everything they’ve got into preparing their children for school, and cooperating in the education of their children. After all, the easiest thing for any teacher to do is teach. It is what they have trained for, and what they have chosen to do with their lives.

“Unfortunately, teaching has become incidental to civilizing and mothering many of these children, feeding them, consoling them, acting as counselors, trying to extract homework, trip money, permission slips, because the parents are not doing their job.

“Send a child to school properly nourished, prepared with materials, dressed appropriately, with respect for education, the teacher, other authority figures, and the teachers will do their job to the best of their ability. And the child will learn to the best of their ability.

“Unfortunately, too many children and, sadly, minority children are coping with home lives that a saint would have trouble handling. Drugs, divorce, abuse, promiscuity, selfish parents and the corrosive influence of the ‘entertainment’ industry make life a living hell for these poor kids.

Ms. Callahan continued: “Why the heck should they give a hoot that ‘a says ah’ [figurative for learning to read!]? But sadly, the politicians won’t touch this with the proverbial 10-foot pole. Fix the homes and the schools, for the most part, will fix themselves.”

When asked for her opinion about social promotion, she suggested, “Why isn’t anyone recommending the old system of 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, etc., so a child is only held over for six months instead of a full year? Often that’s enough to allow the child to mature or catch up.”

It’s so much easier to ask for more money than to criticize minority parents.

In 1997, a Texas Law School professor named Lino Graglia started a huge controversy on campus when he dared to suggest that the main reason minority students didn’t do as well as white students in school was not racism, but that in his view too many black and Hispanic families put a low priority on education. Naturally he was vilified as a racist.

Why do Asian students do so well? It’s not race. It’s not genetics. It’s priority. Any student will excel regardless of ethnicity if his or her parents realize the importance of education in their child’s future.

Condoleezza Rice is not who she is because of a twist of fate. Her parents placed a high priority on education and did all they could to furnish her with the opportunity to excel.

The afternoon of her testimony before the 9/11 panel, I sat on a bus in front of two young black girls whom I overheard snidely call Ms. Rice an “Oreo.”

Then one girl’s cell phone rang and she proceeded to loudly curse out her boyfriend using the “n” word and gross profanity. Her language and Ebonics speech were worlds apart from that of the most important woman in America today, yet they belong to the same race.

I used to write résumés as a sideline and I once visited the home of a Sri Lankan woman to collect details for her curricula vitae. It was a hot summer day, but her two children were in the dining room poring over math books. Is there any doubt her children will do well in school?

Chancellor, our schools don’t need more money as much as parents need a new attitude.