Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (4543)	4/17/2004 10:39:38 AM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 116555

Welcome Pearly - that second post is more relevant. Trying not to have discussions of Iraq here unless there is a strong economic reason that is clear. M

To: maceng2 who wrote (4543)	4/17/2004 11:50:26 AM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 116555

Mauldin Not a lot there except his book promotion. One interesting blurb in the closing remarks: Next week we will get back to economic events. I will probably write about the possibility of the Fed raising rates before the election. Jim Bianco said today he thinks they will raise rates at the June meeting. Jim, my friend, I will take that bet. In fact, I will raise and say not even in August. Next week we look at my reasoning. And it does make a difference as to how you position yourself. frontlinethoughts.com

To: maceng2 who wrote (4543)	4/17/2004 12:00:37 PM
From: mishedlo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

Going, going, gold The barbarous relic, as Keynes called it, is crumbling to dust. When even the venerable NM Rothschild has quit the gold market and the Bank of France, among the most stubborn of the official goldbugs, is thinking again about its bullion holdings, the end of gold as an investment has come a little closer. It will not be before time. The fetishisation of shiny yellow metal, decades after it ceased to be used as the anchor of the international monetary system, is a lingering anomaly in modern financial markets. Perhaps Rothschild's last service to the bullion market could be to keep a live gold trader on display behind glass as a reminder of a bygone age, like the former coal miners who now make a living giving tours of defunct pits. The one advantage of gold as a reserve asset is that, unlike assets based on fiat money, governments cannot make it worthless by inflating it away. But in an era of low inflation, and given that independent inflation-targeting central banks are the norm across the industrialised world, that risk has very sharply diminished. Indeed, for both private and official investors, gold is now a rather risky asset with a nil or low return. The intrinsic value of gold, determined by its use in various industrial processes, is well below its market price. Gold does not grow. So its value to any one investor as an asset is dependent on other investors also holding it as an investment asset. The gold price hangs precariously by its own bootstraps. For private investors to hold gold on this basis is their own foolish affair. For central banks and governments to hold it as a reserve asset is a betrayal of the public on whose behalf they are acting. Despite recent sell-offs, governments and central banks still hold about a fifth of the world's bullion. Their large holdings relative to the size of the market by themselves make gold particularly ineffective as a reserve asset: the very act of official selling of bullion on any large scale to raise cash will itself drive down the price. This danger was amply demonstrated by the UK's unhappy experience of trying to sell some of its gold holdings. Announced in 1999 in a sensibly open and transparent fashion, the sales sparked such a fall in the global bullion price that a group of central banks signed a concord limiting such sales. That has recently been superseded by a new agreement providing for limited official sales. Given the pointlessness of holding gold, the speed of its official sell-off scarcely matters, unless leaching the gold into the market bit by bit somehow maximises the return to the public purse by limiting the impact on the price. That would imply some irrationality on the part of the market. But then holding gold is irrational in the first place. Perhaps the central banks are right to go slowly. Whatever the speed, the direction is clear. Gold is on its way out as an investment and a reserve asset. Three cheers for that. news.ft.com ============================================================ I had to check my calendar. I was wondering if April 1, happened twice this year. A quick check of pm PC clock says that is not the case. M

To: maceng2 who wrote (4543)	4/17/2004 12:22:29 PM
From: mishedlo	Respond to of 116555

Berlin's persistent, if indirect, calls on Welteke to resign triggered speculation that it was campaigning to oust the central banker for resisting its planned use of central bank gold sale proceeds and for attacking its budget policies. uk.news.yahoo.com ========================================================= The conspiracy theory says the government actively helped to stir up the crisis to get him replaced by someone in favour of Bundesbank gold sales. Such would contribute to patching up the German budget deficit. M