Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Runomo™ who wrote (14903)	4/17/2004 6:07:12 PM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 207053

Mo; glad you made out on those. I have a portfolio full of stories like those, each subject to its own particular conditions. Much of whats happening in todays trade, relates to controlling a stocks risk/reward equation as that reward part relates to WHO owns the stock. The use of anergy is quite a large part of the regulatory function on who gets paid. Its whats caused me to identify and describe the markets fourth state; obfuscation. ( along with accumulation, Distribution, neutral states) Lest I be accused of wearing a tin foil cap, let me just support my observations by stating that I've gone through multi year studies of a large basket of stocks, the key characteristics of all of them is that pent up demand is a given, yet, the interference with the supply demand metrics is routine by those who always arrive late. The linkage between the wannabe owners is clear, and the programs used to wrest control away from those who arrived earlier.This is after all a system of churn. During the course of this learning I have developed a good understanding of the relationships as causes and effects. But having said all this I completely agree with Michaels post, that the key; is to extract profits from the process. Regardless of the systems integrity... Coexistance; Now thats a word we all need to think about.