SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (10635)4/18/2004 12:55:03 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 173976
 
Bush violated the US Const??????? Man you gals are wacky. Now I know why the FATHERS DIDN'T GIVE YOU THE VOTE



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (10635)4/18/2004 9:26:35 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
How



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (10635)4/19/2004 9:35:28 AM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
First of all....none of you pinheads have been able to post a "lie" as regards Iraq...not one.....

Second, it took over 4 years following the first Gulf war to fully uncover all of Saddam's weapons programs....it has only been a year since we went into Iraq...but based upon what has already been found...items which should have been declared, secret labs, Salman Pak, Abu Abbas, hidden technology, etc. the President's decision has been more than vindicated....even if stockpiles are never found....

Finally, differences over Constitutional interpretation are common in ANY Administration...the outlines of the war powers of the President, especially the ones implicated by the Padilla case are fuzzy at best...and given this new kind of enemy, existing precedents may not hold much weight...The decision of the USSC will determine if Bush's actions have overstepped those bounds....Stating your opinion as a fact, while a common pinhead Bush hating moron tactic, carries little weight...in fact, none....

J.