Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (6030)	4/19/2004 4:39:18 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: All of them attempt to create an impression that somehow Bush is totally blameless, but somehow it's either Clinton's fault, the CIA's fault, or the FBI's fault - all the while ignoring the fact that if the President of the United States ordered a top priority investigation into all the warnings coming in, there would have been no 9/11. Don, I've got good news for you (and the rest) today!! I've finally made it... I PIECED IT ALL TOGETHER. Here's my latest overhaul of 911 --my definitive theory on what really happened on that fateful day: First, I dismiss the possibility for the WTC towers to have collapsed like a shattered house of cards just because an airliner hit them.... Which means that "controlled demolition" was involved. Whether they were "mini-nukes" or something more conventional is a detail --seismic evidence and NYC firefighters/cops dying from radioactive exposure will eventually be disclosed to (dis)prove it. Now, the above premise means that you are right in assuming that responsibility for 911 reaches the higher echelons of the US executive.... Yet, as far as I'm concerned, I think the buck stops with Cheney --US Vice President Dick Cheney was the real brains behind the whole scheme. BTW, it's a fixture with US politics for the Veep to be a smooth operator of sorts, a Fixer-in-Chief so to speak --from LBJ to Al Gore (and his "BoNY" shenanigans with Eltsine and family...). And who knows if Theodore Roosevelt had anything to do with the assassination of McKinley, back in 1901? Now, let me elaborate on the scheme itself: it was not a very convoluted one. As I always claimed, it was indeed devised --and sold to Prez Bush-- as a regular hijacking of four civilian airliners. That is, the whole operation should have wound up as a bloodless, false-flag sting --pretty much like the London/Ariana hijack. However, that was only part of the story: a subplot was secretly plugged into the original scheme.... A subplot only known and contrived by Cheney and his inner circle. The subplot somehow consisted of hijacking the hijackers themselves and turning them into suicide terrorists. So, it's quite possible that my initial hypothesis of Tajik hijackers sneaked into the US to do the hijacking is right. Since it was a cointelpro scheme that got the greenlight of the Veep himself nobody --within CIA, FBI, NSA,...-- had any authority to foil it. Now let's fast-forward to September 11, 2001: the heavies of the US administration are all in the know --they know today is not your best day to travel by air across the US... Some big intelligence plot is afoot... So NSA Rice buzzes her pal Willie Brown: "Hey Willie, forget about flying over to... stay home and watch TV instead!" Secr. of State C. Powell is even more cautious: on that day, he's out of the country... somewhere in South America --did someone clue him in on the bombing of the State Dept. that day? And where's President Bush? Well, Bush has always felt suspicious about his Dark Eminence Cheney... He knows the guy is capable of hiding a few cards up his sleeve. So Bush can't be outside the country that day --far too risky. I mean, if things turned awry --which they did-- people might say, how come the prez was abroad on that very day? Bush knew about it! etc. On the other hand, Prez Bush didn't want to --or was fast-talked into-- be(ing) (un)available. Bush wasn't at the ready in his War Room, or aboard Air Force One,... No, Bush was conspicuously "unavailable" chatting with children in a one-horse-town.... That means that, when the hijack crisis broke out, Bush wittingly counted himself out: his (Presidential) authority was handed over to the Vice President. And that was the masterstroke of Mastermind Cheney: whereas the Prez was technically unavailable, the Vice President was, for his part, in the thick of it: Cheney was on the ball, most likely at some USAF base. When all four airliners were hijacked by some Tajik(Arab?) patsies, Cheney --temporarily vested with Presidential authority-- ordered USAF fighters to shoot down all four hijacked airliners --lest they should be used as flying bombs against US targets/cities. Thereafter, Cheney set in motion the aforementioned subplot: four bombs were detonated at four high-profile targets that will later be pictured as the terrorists' targets.... Of course, since these targets were never hit by anything but rather "bombed inside out", doctored footages of the action, the gagging of eyewitnesses, and a news blackout were implemented. The Pentagon was an easy matter to deal with since all military personnel are already bound by duty to shut up. But the WTC was a thorny one: civilian lawsuits and rumor would reveal what really happened --hence the need to collapse both towers (and WTC-7) to dispell embarrassing witnesses and THE LACK of evidence, that is, the lack of aircraft debris. At that point, the 911 conspirators were left with two separate story lines: the hijacked airliners that were duly "intercepted" by the USAF, and the "simultaneous" bombings in NY and Washington.... It was just a matter of meshing it all together... All Cheney had to do was to round off the corners so as to squeeze the peg of the hijacked airliners into the round hole of the bombing of NY/Wash. But then, what other story/scenario could have reasonably been told to the American people? The hijacked airliners HAD TO have been used as suicide flying bombs..... QED Gus

To: Don Earl who wrote (6030)	4/19/2004 5:30:44 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Footnote to my post #6034: As I said, no airplanes ever hit anything on Sept 11, 2001. Some conspiracy theorists however claim that either Boeings-turned-drones or cruise missiles were used to crash the targets... But there's one clue to debunk the first premise: the Pentagon crash. If indeed the 911 conspirators used remotely controlled Boeings then how come they didn't use one for the Pentagon?! They took the trouble to use Boeings as flying bombs against the WTC --with the ensuing necessity for them to collapse the towers afterwards --but they deemed it not useful when it came to the Pentagon? Quite illogical since they knew that they couldn't conceal the absence of aircraft debris around the Pentagon by blowing it up altogether! Hence, of all their targets, the Pentagon was THE ONE to be hit by a remotely controlled Boeing.... Reductio ad absurdum! Gus

To: Don Earl who wrote (6030)	4/21/2004 4:07:09 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Don and All, On May 14th a group of us here in Bend, OR is putting on a seminar titled something like "9/11 Unanswered Questions, A Citizen's Inquiry". If you've got a catchier title, I'm all ears (or eyes). Also, we intend to use the Global Outlook "Powerpoint" presentation as the introduction to the subject to the general public who we hope show up in significant numbers. globaloutlook.ca The 26 Top 9/11 Anomalies List The Powerpoint Presentation I'll let individuals decide which version they'd like to download to review. This slide show was presented at the 9/11 International Inquiry in San Francisco and was one of the best sessions according to one of my activist friends who is not nearly as deep into the research as we are. I'm building a CD to use for our multimedia presentation, and I'll be including this Powerpoint presentation and have additional materials including Paul Thompson's 2-page and 10-page 9/11 Timelines, Mark Elsis 9/11 Timeline, Elsis's Stand Down - NORAD and 9/11 webpage, the Mariani Lawsuit, The Family Steering Committee 20 page letter penned by Carol Ashley in late January, testimony by Mary Schiavo, Gail Sheehy's articles on the Four Moms (aka Jersey Girls), Operation Northwoods documents....... If you have other suggestions on useful materials to add to the mix, I'd be delighted to put them on the CDs. Which I may make up as a handout to those who want them. * Over the coming weeks, I'm thinking about posting the contents of the individual slides of the Global Outlook slide show here on the thread with the hope that contributors here can add color commentary, links and amplification of the points being made. Thanks in advance for any help forthcoming. :) * Here is an example of the contents of the slide show, and the sort of detail I might consider adding: SLIDE CONTENT: 02. No Immediate Jet Scramble • Why were no fighter jets scrambled in time to intercept the hijacked planes? • It is normal procedure for the FAA to call in air force interceptors the minute any plane deviates even slightly off course. • Flight 77 was able to fly uninterrupted for 1 hour and 45 minutes after detection! • Was the air force on ‘stand-down’ orders? DETAIL: * Fighter jets were never scrambled from Andrews Air Force Base, the logical place to send up jet interceptors from in order to protect the Washington, D.C./Pentagon airspace. Instead, fighter jets were scrambled from Langley AFB, which is 180 miles from Washington. The jets which did respond seemed to be flying at less than 500 MPH, in spite of the fact that they are capable of 3 times that speed. Why so slow? * Furthermore the Andrews AFB website showed 2 squadrons of Air National Guard interceptors prior to 9/11. But after the website was taken down for a week after 9/11, those squadrons vanished from the website. Why? * The Air National Guard had responded to deviation in normal commercial and general aviation 67 times in the year prior to 9/11. Why was standard operation procedure not followed, catastrophically, in all four instances of hi-jacked jets on 9/11? * In a stunning display of amnesia or "failure to recall", Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, General Richard Myers seemed to be impossibly vague about the events of 9/11 when he was interviewed on 9/13/01 in his confirmation hearings moving him from the head of the USAF/NORAD to the Chairmanship. Myers was the key person in the NORAD chain of command on 9/11, yet he seems to not know what was going on. Remarkable. We have never seen any of the answers to the questions about the events of the morning of 9/11 from Sens. Carl Levin and Bill Nelson that Myers promised to send to Congress in written form. Sources: "Stand Down: Exposing NORAD's Wag The 911 Window Dressing Tale" standdown.net Richard Myers Confirmation Transcript: Message 20004877 cooperativeresearch.org *** That give us the flavor of what I hope to create.....