Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (15991)	4/19/2004 11:14:03 AM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Kerry on Meet the Press Designed to offset President Bush's press conference last week, Senator John F. Kerry went on Meet the Press on Sunday. He struggled with specifics and long-winded contradictory explanations....again. From the transcript-- "MR. RUSSERT: If you were elected one year from now, will there be 100,000 American troops in Iraq? SEN. KERRY: It depends on what the situation is you find on the ground on January 20th of 2005. I will tell you this, Tim. I will immediately reach out to other nations in a very different way from this administration. Within weeks of being inaugurated, I will return to the U.N. and I will literally, formally rejoin the community of nations and turn over a proud new chapter in America's relationship with the world, which will do a number of things. Number one, change how we're approaching North Korea. Number two, change how we're dealing with AIDS globally. Number three, change how we're doing with proliferation with Russia and other countries. Number four, change our approach to global warming and the effort of 160 nations. And that will take some of the poison out of the well that this administration has put there. MR. RUSSERT: Senator, the concern I think people have watching is that there's no other guarantee that these other nations are going to come forward with any kind of troops or help. Now, this is the way--Democratic adviser Ivo Daalder had this to say: "[Kerry] faces questions about whether his alternative has been overrun by events--whether it is still realistic for the U.N. to accept political responsibility for Iraq, or other nations to contribute more military help, when conditions are so chaotic..." SEN. KERRY: That's an accurate... MR. RUSSERT: Let me just finish here. SEN. KERRY: Yeah. MR. RUSSERT: Ivo Daalder, a national security adviser to President Clinton: "Is the U.N. more capable of running Iraq than we are? If we turn this over to NATO, are we going to get a significantly larger number of troops? In both cases, the answer is no." And then NATO Secretary-General George Robertson added this. He said, "The Afghan stabilization has prevented NATO from getting involved in Iraq. We're trying to get it right to make sure it works in the long term. ...And before we take on any new obligation, like Iraq, I think we've got to get Afghanistan right." The U.N. today, front page of The Times. U.N. envoys are worried about going back in there. SEN. KERRY: Sure, they are. Of course, they are. MR. RUSSERT: So if Iraq is not secure, how can you possibly say the U.N. and NATO are going to come to our rescue when they don't have the troops or the interest of going in there? SEN. KERRY: Tim, that is the dilemma. That is exactly the quandary that President Bush and this administration have put the United States of America in. And the tragedy is that there were three great opportunities for this administration to make it otherwise. Opportunity number one was when we voted and when the president broke his promise to build a legitimate coalition by being patient with the U.N. inspection process. Opportunity number two was when the statue fell in Baghdad and Kofi Annan invited the United States to come to the table and offered help and we rejected it. And opportunity number three was when this president went to the U.N. last fall and once again did not invite people, didn't even acknowledge the kind of difficulties we were in that might have elicited some sympathy from other people. Now, here we are. I believe the following very deeply. Number one, we cannot fail. I've said that many times. And if it requires more troops in order to create the stability that eliminates the chaos, that can provide the groundwork for other countries, that's what you have to do." Nothing close to a sound bite in that. Kerry needs to get better at these type of interviews, or quit doing them. washingtondispatch.com

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (15991)	4/19/2004 11:15:41 AM
From: JakeStraw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Kerry Inflates Combat Action in 'Meet the Press' Account Monday, April 19, 2004 1:09 a.m. EDT In his account to "Tour of Duty" author Douglas Brinkley, Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry described his first encounter with enemy forces in Vietnam as an inconsequential skirmish that "hardly qualified as combat." But on Sunday's "Meet the Press," Kerry's recollection of the episode was far more dramatic, with the top Democrat saying the confrontation not only was "frightening" but also was probably the worst combat his unit had experienced during the entire war. Defending himself against charges that he put in for a Purple Heart for a relatively minor flesh wound after the Dec. 2, 1968 skirmish, Kerry told NBC newsman Tim Russert: "We were in combat. We were in a very, very - probably one of the most frightening - if you ask anybody who was with me, the two guys who were with me, was probably the most frightening night that they had that they were in Vietnam." But in his account to biograpger Brinkley, Kerry dismissed the altercation as "a minor skirmish." "It was a half-assed action that hardly qualified as combat," he confessed, in a discrepancy first reported Sunday by FreeRepublic.com. "I felt terribly seasoned after this minor skirmish," Kerry continued to Brinkley. "But since I couldn't put my finger on what we had really accomplished or on what had happened, it was difficult to feel satisfied." "Meet the Press" moderator Tim Russert was apparently unaware of the contradiction and did not question Kerry on his newly dramatized account. Kerry's earlier, much tamer version of his first encounter with the enemy appears on pages 146 and 148 of "Tour of Duty."

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (15991)	4/19/2004 10:09:06 PM
From: the navigator	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

When did you stop defending Bush? I remember when I stopped defending Bush.