SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (16134)4/19/2004 5:39:36 PM
From: tontoRespond to of 81568
 
It is so difficult to stop terrorists as we all know. If we had the 130,000 troops looking for them here everyone would be screaming about our rights, the military's function, how this is becoming a police state... it is a no win position.



To: redfish who wrote (16134)4/19/2004 5:50:55 PM
From: Augustus GloopRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
<<if we didn't have 130,000 troops in the one place we know the terrorists ain't.>>

Actually Sadr is there (you know - The Iranian funded terrorist) and there are people flowing in from Syria. We're doing battle on that border as we speak.



To: redfish who wrote (16134)4/19/2004 6:39:58 PM
From: lorneRespond to of 81568
 
redfish You said...." Probably we would have a better chance if we didn't have 130,000 troops in the one place we know the terrorists ain't.".....

And if there were 130,000 troops available to look for islam terrorists in the USA just exactly what would they do.

How would they identify the enemy....Hey maybe racial profiling?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News