SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (48789)4/20/2004 1:08:37 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
CB, Question 1: Did you mean to say your recommendation is to "not stomp on bubbles"?

Question 2: Do you think there are material/substantive differences between construction/urbanization/industrialization bubbles and a consumption/housing inflation/financial valuation bubbles?

Question 3: Do you have an opinion on what the top three bubbles are at this time in this world, in terms of scale, scope, and possible effects?

On the matter of China and bubble, check this out Message 18226135
November 12th, 2002
Hi Pezz, on China: It will ramp into bubble dimensions and go 'pop' 24 months from today.
[EDIT: Key words = China Bubble 2002]


Wild guess, or I am lucky at spotting bubbles and scripting their demise.

Last Question: What subject matters shall we discuss this round?

Something controversial or something fun? Same really.



To: Ilaine who wrote (48789)5/20/2004 7:59:02 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello CB, <<Stomping on bubbles is not smart>>

... eh, but not stomping on them may be stupid, because eventually what ought to happen will, one awful way or another terrible path:

quote.bloomberg.com
"Fed's Bernanke Says Rate Policy Not `Unconditional'"

Chugs, Jay