Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (6044)	4/20/2004 2:09:48 PM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

<<<Bottom line: those pictures and footages of airplanes hitting the WTC ARE NO EVIDENCE.>>> I worry about you Gus. New York City has something like 10 million people, give or take a few million. The cameras saw the planes hit the buildings and witnesses saw the planes hit the buildings. You also have the huge, fuel fireballs which could not possibly be mistaken for high explosives. HE gives off a brilliant white flash, not big, smokey, red and orange fireballs. Could HE have been used in addition to the fireballs? Certainly, the photographic evidence suggests that to be the case, but it could NOT have been used instead of the fireballs. Was there a cover up on the Pentagon hit? I think that's obvious. They wouldn't let reporters take pictures for the first hour or so and it's been fairly well shown that the security camera film has been edited for public consumption. The problem is reporters did take photos of the debris, and eye witnesses did see the plane crash into the building. The missing plane fantasy doesn't hold up unless you completely ignore the evidence that does exist, and make up a bunch of other evidence that does not exist.