Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (16555)	4/20/2004 9:41:15 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

No they're still irrelevant. Don't try and turn that around on me when you guys are the ones who place your beliefs in that money skimming organization over your own countries. If they are irrelevant, why is Bush asking them to figure out how to transfer control of the country back to the Iraqi people? You'd think that George would have had a plan for that BEFORE attacking Iraq. I understand that there are up to 70 people involved in this scandal...and they are from 45 countries, and I also understand that there are US people involved. Because this program was abused, does not mean the UN is irrelevant. It means we need to put more energy into the organization. The bad apples will be drummed out, and some may have to do some jail time. Heck we got bad CEO's here in the US. Ken Lay, friend of Bush, screwed more people for more money in the Enron scandal then the oil for food program. Is Bush now irrelevant too? Orca