SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (41094)4/21/2004 5:35:01 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 70112
 
Lucent Posts Profit, Boosts Sales Outlook
Tuesday April 20, 8:38 am ET
By Ben Klayman

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Lucent Technologies Inc. (NYSE:LU - News), one of the world's largest makers of telecommunications equipment, on Tuesday posted its third consecutive quarterly profit and boosted its sales outlook for the year as investment in equipment by telephone companies showed signs of improving.
ADVERTISEMENT


The Murray Hill, New Jersey-based company said it still expects to post a profit for the year and raised its top-line outlook, saying it sees sales rising in the low single digits on a percentage basis. It previously had said it expected sales in fiscal 2004 to be flat to slightly up.

"If in fact the company is more bullish about its expectations for the remainder of the year, then that should bode well," said Avtera management analyst Tom Lauria, who owns Lucent stock.

Lucent's stock rose almost 2 percent in before-market trading on INET.

Lucent reported net income applicable to common shareholders of $68 million, or 2 cents a share, for the second quarter ended on March 31, compared with a year-earlier loss of $553 million, or 14 cents a share.

Excluding one-time items, Lucent earned about 3 cents a share. On that basis, analysts on average were expecting a profit of about 2 cents, according to Reuters Research.

Sales fell 9 percent to $2.19 billion from a year earlier and slipped 3 percent from the preceding quarter. The Reuters Research estimate was $2.16 billion.

Lauria said the company's improvement in gross profit margins even as sales fell was highly encouraging.

Lucent's 2004 sales outlook is likely conservative, said Lehman Brothers analyst Steve Levy in a research note. He has an "overweight" rating on the stock.

Analysts were expecting Lucent to report a 2004 profit before one-time items of about 11 cents a share on sales of $8.85 billion, according to Reuters Research, a unit of Reuters Group Plc. Lucent had sales of $8.47 billion in fiscal 2003.

Many suppliers have said the telecom industry is stabilizing or improving after three years of declining spending, but Lucent had been more cautious in its outlook before Tuesday's improved sales forecast.

Lucent, which along with Canada's Nortel Networks Corp. (Toronto:NT.TO - News; NYSE:NT - News) and France's Alcatel (Paris:CGEP.PA - News; NYSE:ALA - News) ranks among the world's largest telecom equipment makers, returned to profitability in last year's September-ending quarter after suffering 13 straight quarters of net losses.

Slack customer demand and excess network capacity, built during the heady days of the Internet boom, forced phone companies to slash spending.

Lucent was the poster child for its industry's struggles, ringing up $1.16 billion in losses in fiscal 2003 and about $30 billion in cumulative losses during the downturn.

The company sold assets and businesses, cut money-losing products, shifted work to outside manufacturers and slashed almost two-thirds of its work force in an effort to restore profits.

Lucent's wireline business sales fell 7 percent from the preceding quarter to $738 million, while its wireless unit sales slipped only 1 percent from the previous strong quarter to $951 million. The services business rose 3 percent to $479 million.


Lucent's stock rose to $4.41 on INET from Monday's New York Stock Exchange (News - Websites) close of $4.33. So far this year, the company's shares have gained about 52 percent, compared with an 8 percent increase by the American Stock Exchange Network index (AMEX:^NWX - News), which is made up of peer stocks.



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (41094)4/21/2004 5:50:02 AM
From: Johnny Canuck  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70112
 
Weigh Your Options - Part 1

April 20, 2004

In response to recent reader interest in option trading, and our new option charts service, today I'd like to illustrate a key point that all option traders (and all investors, for that matter) should be aware of. Some of you will already understand these concepts, while others may not. In either case, it's a lesson worth learning for the first time, or again. For those of you who don't trade options, don't quit reading just yet - we'll be wiping away some of the mystery behind option pricing.

As a basic review, an option is simply the right to buy or sell 100 shares of a stock at a predetermined price, within a predetermined amount of time. Of course, if you want to have this right, you must pay for it. This is what investors do when they buy an option - they pay someone else for the right to buy or sell a stock before the option expires. Obviously anyone who buys an option is reasonably confident that the stock will change price as they predicted. If they are correct in their prediction, the option they purchased will increase in value, and they can sell it for a profit (or they can choose to exercise the option). Conversely, the person who sold the buyer the option thinks the stock will not move as the buyer predicted by the time the option expires.

For example, suppose XYZ company shares are currently trading at $35. If I buy an August 35 call option on XYZ company at a price (or 'premium') of $5.00, I am buying the right to buy 100 XYZ shares at $35 per share by August's expiration day. For this right, I am paying $500 (100 shares x $5.00 premium = $500 ). Obviously I feel that XYZ shares will be at least $5 higher than the current price by the time the call option expires, since I was willing to pay $5 more (per share) than their current value for the option. But I only have a few days to turn a profit before the option expires, so the clock is ticking on my prediction. Suppose that between the day I purchase the call option and the day the option expires, the stock moves from $35 to $45, for a $10 gain. Since I own the right to buy XYZ shares at 35 per share, and shares are at $45 before the option expired, how much is my call option worth? Let's see. If I can buy 100 shares at $35, and sell those 100 shares at $45, I can make a profit of $10 on each of those 100 shares. That makes my call option worth $1000 (100 shares x $10 premium = $1000). Since I originally paid $500 for the option, my net profit of $500 gives me a gain of 100%.

Unfortunately, option pricing in the real world is not nearly as black and white, nor is it that simple. Most option traders know that just because a stock changes price by a certain dollar amount, it doesn't mean that the option does too. The difference between the dollar change in the stock and the dollar change in the option price is known as 'delta' (one of the 'greeks' in option trading). For example, if the delta for an option is 50, this means if the share price of the stock goes up by $1.00, then the premium (or price) of the option will only go up $0.50. Why is knowing the delta of any particular option important? It allows you to set accurate, yet reasonable, price targets for your option trading.

As always, a real-life example will best illustrate this point. Take the QQQ's for instance. The QQQ's closed at 36.53 yesterday. The closest 'in the money' option for the QQQ's is the May 36 call, which last traded at a premium of $1.20. The delta for this option is 61.5, meaning for every $1 the QQQ's move, the option premium will theoretically change by $0.615. If the QQQ's move higher by $1, then the option premium will move to a theoretical $1.80 (options only trade in nickel or dime increments) for a gain of 50%, or 60 cents. But what if the QQQ's lose $1.00? Then you will have lost about $0.60 of your $1.20 premium, or 66%. Not an enviable outcome, but not as bad as losing a whole $1 on your $1.20 investment.

On the other hand, the May 35 QQQ call last traded at $1.90, and its delta is 77.2. If the QQQ's move up $1.00, then the option price increases to about $2.70, for a 42% gain. Should the QQQ's fall by $1, then the option price falls to $1.10, for a 42% loss. That's not necessarily good news either, but it's much easier to take than the 66% loss from the 36 calls. Of course, the upsdie potential is also limited

So what determines delta? Primarily the time left until expiration, and how deeply in the money the option is. In other words, how risky an option is will determine the delta value. But the delta calculation isn't even the critical point of today's TrendWatch. The goal today is simply to point out that not all options are created equal, and you must weigh the risk and reward potential of each one. And more than that, it allows you to set reasonable price targets based on what the underlying stock is likely to do. The delta analysis is a logical, organized way to add some precision to your option trading.

For a detailed look at delta analysis and other option pricing models, I recommend Leonard Yates' High High Performance Options Trading, and Sheldon Natenberg's Option Volatility & Pricing. We'll also be looking at another important option pricing aspect in Thursday's TrendWatch - time decay.

Key Support and Resistance Levels



To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (41094)4/21/2004 8:41:32 AM
From: Logain Ablar  Respond to of 70112
 
except for this being a little deeper pull back than he forecast its still in line with his overall view. He had a pullback ending tomorrow +/- 2 days.

investorshub.com