Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (43362)	4/21/2004 11:43:19 AM
From: Mannie	Respond to of 89467

Wednesday, April 21, 2004 Iraq's coalition of hired guns SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD Of the armed forces supporting the U.S.-led coalition efforts to pacify and rebuild Iraq, about 20,000 of them are hired guns. This army of what The New York Times called "shadow soldiers" raises troubling questions about security, legality and morality. While almost all of these "security forces" are taxpayer-funded, through the coalition, private corporate contractors or various subcontractors, almost all of them also operate free of any uniform U.S. control. Only now is the Coalition Provisional Authority beginning to draw up such rules for private security companies. (The authority is one of the private companies' clients.) "Security in a hostile fire area is a classic military mission," says Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., a member of the Armed Services Committee. "Delegating this mission to private contractors raises serious questions." Indeed. Consider the scope of the privateers: They number about 20,000, nearly twice as many soldiers as from the United Kingdom (the second-largest country in the coalition) and nearly as many as the 26,500 troops from 34 countries. Under what international authority may a U.S. civilian employed by a security firm in Iraq shoot and kill a civilian Iraq citizen? What liability is there for the employee, his employer, the U.S. government? How are these employees vetted -- if at all -- for such things as criminal backgrounds? (Four security guards killed in January were former members of South Africa's apartheid-era security forces.) What are the risks -- and liabilities -- of "friendly fire" incidents with coalition troops and security personnel? Perhaps the most important question is whether this is any way to fight a war.