SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (568056)4/23/2004 10:52:03 AM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
Moron-It's been TRIED. See US economic history, 1929 to 1932.

Clinton/Rubin tried to bring that "golden age" back. Fortunately they failed...



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (568056)4/23/2004 10:59:50 AM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
re: if corps in the US were forced to operate here in order to sell here nobody would be "moving out"

Lizzie
things like that do not work. You force companies to operate here and then tax them at will and the result is that they would be driven out of business by foreign competition.



To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (568056)4/23/2004 12:48:15 PM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
What you are trying to force by this brand of protectionism is artificially high wages and therefore a severe reduction in employment and productivity. As it is today, there is a greater un-met demand for basic comforts (and for jobs to afford them) elsewhere in the world than here in America. This un-met demand, because it is so plentiful, places a natural pressure on business to fill it, since it promises to make the cost per unit of work much lower. With lower cost of work, a lower cost of goods results in generally lower prices to the consumer. Once the un-met demand for basic comforts is filled, workers tend to demand non-essential comforts, increasing costs and placing pressure on business to seek favorable labor costs elsewhere, filling un-met demands there. In this way wealth is naturally spread around the globe.

Were your ideas put into effect, un-met demand for basic needs would be filled much more slowly (if at all), with the same disastrous effects we have seen in the more localized economies of the past. Additionally, in the developed world the vast amounts of terribly inexpensive and high quality goods now taken for granted would vanish.

The cost of labor in America and in other developed countries is high due to the now ubiquitous treatment of non-essential comforts as essential needs, even "rights." The pressure against this high price it is natural. We ought not expect that by artificially holding up the price against the natural pressure, as you wish to do, we will be able to maintain life as we know it. You can't get something for nothing. Nature is pressuring the cost of work, indeed the value of life, ever downward, downward to the level of the neediest, hungriest person willing and able to do work. That person is going to get his shot at survival whether we like it or not. We ought to be civilized about it for all of our sakes, rather than try to destroy him as you are attempting.