SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Machaon who wrote (568416)4/24/2004 10:30:18 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
That girl is an idiot. Without regard to the ridiculous content of her post, which is substantial, the flawed conclusion that she "knows" something due to speculation is just amazing.

Now that is the type of personality that should never have power of any type.



To: Machaon who wrote (568416)4/25/2004 2:37:20 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
You wrote:"The reason I know that Saddam did not give that much $$$ to terrorists is because he was more concerned with his own aggrandizement and well being..........ie. expensive palaces and cars, big yachts."

I am always fascinated by the confused logic of Democrats.


And I am fascinated by the GOP's willingness to believe your president's lies.

You are 100% positive that Saddam did not give "that much" $$$ to terrorists, because he was preoccupied with luxury? You think that Saddam's aggrandizement precluded him 24 hours per day from other activities, such as planning covert operations against America?

Yes. I think Saddam's al Qaeda links is a figment of your paranoia. In fact, there are no links. That's been said over and over for the past year but you all are too something to figure it out.

Do you think that Saddam had time to go to the bathroom? How about sports events? How about executions? How about invading other countries? How about sex?

You say that you know exactly what Saddam did every day, and it did not include the funding of terrorism? You say that you know positively that Saddam was not going to increase funding of terrorism, or that Saddam was not going to try to get even with America?


I think you all are so paranoid that if you're not planning a war, you're designing missiles and bombs.



To: Machaon who wrote (568416)4/25/2004 2:40:39 AM
From: AK2004  Respond to of 769670
 
Robert
do confuse democrats and reject, no democrat or republican would want reject on their side