Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (40934)	4/26/2004 2:48:07 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793927

No doubt about it. The Boston papers don't like Kerry. Well, they know him best! Kerry disclosure: Plenty more to tell By Boston Herald editorial staff Monday, April 26, 2004 Sen. John Kerry's disingenuous disclosure strategy is raising far more questions than giving answers. With the dust-up about his military records barely settled, the Kerry campaign is coming up with an excuse a minute to keep from releasing Teresa Heinz Kerry's tax returns. And last week's decision to detail Kerry's meetings with lobbyists backfired badly. When it comes to political disclosure, there's no such thing as going halfway. Kerry bungled the release of his war records, stalling and therefore raising doubts about his service. The Kerry campaign has now changed its story three times - count 'em three - about why it won't release Teresa Heinz Kerry's tax records (though it's ``reconsidering''). First, the refusal was to protect Heinz Kerry's privacy. Then it was to protect her sons' privacy. Now, it turns out, Kerry's wife hasn't even filed her 2003 tax returns and has an extension until August. Kerry still hasn't fully released his health records, and the lobbyist records he put out only date back to 1989. A full four years of Kerry's Senate service is unaccounted for. And is it a bizarre new Kerry campaign strategy to emphasize that he's been a Washington insider for much of the last two decades? cw-0The not-so-subtle subtext to Kerry's ploy is that he's Mr. Disclosure and President Bush [related, bio] is not (all those secret Cheney meetings with energy executives to come up with, gasp, an energy policy.) But first of all, Kerry is not Mr. Disclosure for all the aforementioned reasons. And the missing four years of lobbyists' meetings raise questions about Kerry's activities during a time when Kerry himself has said he can't remember where he lived. (Boston Globe reports in 1996 determined Kerry, at various times in his first Senate term, lived at cut-rate rent or rent-free on the dime of political fund-raisers, including Robert Farmer, then a senior vice president of a major Washington lobbying firm.) We're not aghast that a sitting senator considering legislation affecting industry would meet with representatives of those industries. Lobbying isn't a dirty word when practiced legally. But if you're going to tell all - and accuse the other guy of hiding something - you can't pick and choose what you disclose. Kerry may be hoping the best defense is a good offense. So far he's played neither very well. © Copyright by the Boston Herald and Herald Interactive Advertising Systems, Inc.