Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Football Forum (NFL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (21508)	4/26/2004 1:13:53 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 45639

I think he's just mad about his deal. He has a new agent who has fired him up about more money which irritates me. I'd be willing to re-work his deal BUT the damage is done. His conduct in public changed the direction of our draft and thus hurt the team. MacKenzie is more at fault than the Packers are in this situation. He's a player under contract and thats all. He has no say in who gets hired for defensive coaches and to desire to change a deal that gave him security for life before he was a proven star is a little bit disingenuous. If we trade him I want a star player. If we pay him more money I want him to fire his new agent first. Otherwise I'd show him that we own his ASS until after 2006 at which point he'll have NO VALUE on the market after sitting for 3 years.