SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bearcatbob who wrote (18208)4/26/2004 8:34:44 PM
From: Raymond DurayRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Falluja, Najaf and the First Law of Holes
By William Rivers Pitt
t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 26 April 2004

truthout.org

Anyone who believes that April has been the cruelest month of this Iraq war - 111 Americans killed
with the total dead now at 718, hundreds upon hundreds of Iraqi civilians killed - should gird themselves
for the reality that the worst, the very worst, the unimaginably awful, is still yet to come.

It is bad enough that this second Bush war in Iraq has yielded nothing of what was promised by
George and his merry crew. There are no weapons of mass destruction, there was no connection
between the deposed Hussein regime and al Qaeda, there was no connection between Hussein and
September 11, there will be no democracy for Iraq, and the Iraqi people have most definitely not
welcomed us with open arms.

Instead, Bush has mobilized anti-American sentiment to such a staggering degree that Shi'ite and
Sunni, enemies for generations past counting, have united to fight us. The invasion and occupation has
spurred an al Qaeda recruitment drive that has swelled the ranks of that organization. A lot of people
are dead, American and British and Spanish and Polish and Iraqi alike. Nine Americans and 28 Iraqis
were killed this weekend alone. The light at the end of this tunnel is an oncoming freight train.

That's not the worst part, however. The worst part is yet to come, in two cities called Falluja and
Najaf. Americans paying attention to the spiral of violence in recent weeks will recognize those names,
for they have been at the center of heavy combat since the month of April began. Bush administration
officials, rocked back on their heels by the eruption of death there, were forced at one point to sue for a
cease fire with the 'insurgents' they had supposedly defeated last May, when the mission was
declared accomplished and the end of major combat operations was declared over during a photo-op
on an aircraft carrier several time zones away from the violence.

The cease fire has failed, and American forces are at this moment surrounding Falluja and Najaf with
the intention of invading these cities and routing the 'insurgents.' A showdown is coming, and nothing
good will be made of it.

U.S. military planners have spent many years now studying about and training soldiers for the
realities of urban combat. The city of Falluja should be the first chapter in the urban combat strategy
binder titled "Worst Terrain Imaginable."
The city has nearly 300,000 residents and is made up of a
dizzying maze of narrow streets, wide boulevards and back alleys. Most of the apartments have
porches that will serve Iraqi snipers and RPG-toting helicopter hunters well. Every neighborhood has a
mosque, a school, markets and clinics which, if struck by an errant American bomb, will deliver
horrible numbers of civilian casualties.

The politics of the looming Falluja incursion are another thing again. Hajim al-Hassani, of the Iraqi
Islamic Party, sits on the American-compiled Iraqi Governing Council, but has little credibility among
the people in Falluja. He is seen as not having been able to stop American forces from fighting in that
city, and the Iraqi Islamic Party itself has been accused of collaboration with America. The mayor of
Falluja, Mahmoud Ibrahim, is disliked by many of the city's residents. He informed officers of the
American forces a few days ago that he had no control over Jolan, Hayal Askeri and Shuhada, three
sections of the city which make up half its area. In other words, both representatives for this town are
basically useless in any effort to call a halt to the attack.

The religious aspect is easily the most explosive element in this matter. Falluja is a Sunni town.
Through the almost mystical bungling of the Bush administration, it has become tied to the holy city of
Najaf, a Shi'ite stronghold.
This city, like Falluja, has been surrounded by American forces and faces
imminent attack. If an attack against Najaf is indeed undertaken, the consequences for Iraq, and
indeed for the entire Middle East, will be unimaginable.

Najaf is the site of the tomb of Ali, the most important Shi'ite saint. It is a holy city, like Mecca and
Medina, and is the symbolic capital for Shi'ites all around the world. If American forces attack Najaf,
every Shi'ite on the planet will have a dog in the fight. Iran, a Shi'ite-controlled nation, may well become
involved. Shi'ite religious leaders will issue fatwas demanding massive numbers of suicide attacks
against Americans.

Do the math.

American forces attack Falluja, and become ensconced in a brutal street-to-street fight within the
confines of that maze-like city. 300,000 civilians will be caught in the crossfire, and the resulting
carnage will enflame the Iraqi people to a degree not yet seen. American forces will absorb brutal
casualties. If the U.S. decides to avoid troop casualties by bombing Falluja in a repeat of Shock and
Awe, the loss of civilian life will be beyond severe.

Simultaneously, American forces attack Najaf, a holy city central to the spiritual lives of millions of
Shi'ites around the world. An explosion of rage will engulf the Middle East. Iran, which has something
resembling a real army, could very well drive across the border to engage American forces that are
already stretched. This war, already a ridiculous mess, will become an unmitigated catastrophe.

Anyone who thinks Iraq is a bad situation now should reserve judgment until the end of this week.
George W. Bush and his crew have clearly forgotten the First Law of Holes: When you find yourself
deep in a hole, stop digging. If this is what Bush meant when he talked about "changing the world" in
his recent prime-time press conference, we are all in a great deal of trouble.



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (18208)4/26/2004 8:41:20 PM
From: CalculatedRiskRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
First, I've tried to be straight up and honest in all my posts. I've tried to correct any post with factual errors.

Second, I've repeatedly written that I do not blame Bush for the 2001 recession. Bush's economic failures are post 9/11. The recession ended in November, 2001, and the recovery has been slow and very uneven. I believe the poor recovery is due to Bush’s policies. In previous posts, I’ve tried to explain my thinking, and I’m sure I will again (usually I discuss economics on other threads).

Third, Kerry is not responsible for moveon.org's ads. Sure, he could complain, but he cannot control their content. That would be illegal. In my opinion, these ads are not all that helpful for Kerry; they detract from his message and make people think he is being negative.

All of Kerry's TV ads have been positive (jobs, defense, healthcare, etc.). With the exception of the "steady leadership" ad (reminds me of the captain of the Titanic<g>), all of Bush's ads have been negative. Hence the phrase, Smear and Fear.

Blaming a candidate for the posts of certain SI characters is obviously unfair. Neither Kerry or Bush controls the content of posters (well, at least not me)! I've encountered, uh ... non-constructive posts for both candidates.

Best to all. It will be a long year ...



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (18208)4/26/2004 9:08:31 PM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Chinu - is one of hate.

I have always opposed Bush's policies. I have not attacked him personally except to rebut personal attacks on Kerry. I still maintain that he has no business marching into a sovereign country when the UN was involved in determining the possession of WMD. I am not convinced that it was an error in intelligence and not that the intelligence was deliberately twisted to make it appear so.

We made such a big deal about the Lewinsky affair, wasted all those tax dollars that did not benefit the nation in any way at all.

Now we have the Bush WH in a maze of lies. It has not only caused the loss of many US lives but also the loss of lives of the innocent Iraqis. Unlike Bush, I do not believe in "collateral damage" when it comes to innocent lives. You term my posts as preaching hate for Bush. Then what posts will you term as anger against Bush.