SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18586)4/27/2004 5:20:51 PM
From: Alan SmitheeRespond to of 81568
 
Recommended reading by William Langiewiesche

Anarchy at Sea

It's a good discussion of modern piracy, and includes a discussion of Osama Bin Laden's "fleet" and the implications of that fleet.

Pretty sobering.

wesjones.com



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18586)4/27/2004 5:39:13 PM
From: Ann CorriganRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Now that we know about the "secret" navy, it's days are numbered. Technology has probably already pinpointed each ship's location. It's only a matter of time before a smart bomb lands on their decks. Hopefully Osama will be on board one of them.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18586)4/27/2004 7:55:23 PM
From: BearcatbobRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Dumbest Chinu.

Please explain how this can happen.

"Unfortunately, the biggest danger posed by an al-Qaeda ship is not its ability to transport explosives or terrorists. The ship itself can be used as a giant bomb to wipe out a US port. If the port has a large LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) storage facility or a gasoline refinery, the secondary explosion could destroy much of the adjacent city. (The devastating crash of fuel-laden trains in North Korea provides a tragic and relevant example of the danger.) "

How many died in North Korea? Not exactly wiping out a large city. I suppose the issue is the definition of adjacent. Ya know - it all depends on what the meaning of is is!