Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChinuSFO who wrote (18745)	4/27/2004 11:51:48 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Bush Deploys SDI Even Though It Doesn't Work Missile defense system could be put on alert in September even if it fails tests: general Tue Apr 27, 1:18 PM ET Add Politics - AFP to My Yahoo! WASHINGTON (AFP) - The Pentagon (news - web sites) could put a ground-based missile defense system on alert as early as September when the first interceptor missiles will be deployed in Alaska even if it fails two flight tests this summer, the general who heads the program said. The first five ground-based interceptor missiles will be in their silos at Fort Greely, Alaska by September, complete with hardware, software and communications, he said. Three or four more missiles will be added in December, and another 10 at both Greely and Vandenberg Air Force Base in California the following year if Congress funds the Pentagon's 9.2-billion dollar budget request, he said. Critics have charged that the system is being fielded without being tested. The General Accounting Office (news - web sites), a congressional watchdog, said in a report this month that the system was "unproven" despite eight intercept flight tests. Two more flight tests -- only one of them an attempted intercept -- are slated to be held in a few months, Kadish said. Asked whether the system could be put on alert even if those tests fail, Kadish said, "it could." "When it goes on alert it could be a function of many different things, including the world situation at the time," he said. "If they both fail, we're got big problems that we're going to have to go figure out what to do about," he said. The Bush administration has made fielding a missile defense system a top priority, arguing that even a rudimentary system would deter countries from seeking to develop long-range missiles. (* what countries, where?) Kadish said US intelligence indicates no change in the long-range missile threat from North Korea (news - web sites) and Iran. (* they have no ICBM's) The first phase of the ground-based system would defend all 50 US states against a missile attack by North Korea, but not Iran. (Iran has no ICBM's either) Of eight previous attempts at intercepting a long-range target missile, five have been successful. But the last intercept attempt was more than two years ago in December 2002, and the next test is more than three months behind schedule. The interceptor's "kill vehicle," which is guided into a collision course in space with an incoming missile, has since been redesigned. Kadish said the discovery of circuit board failure in March prompted an intensive review of the the redesigned kill vehicle, which has set back the testing. ( It doesn't work) "Once that's complete we'll do the flight test. We expect them to be successful. Let me make that clear," he said. "But the nature of rocketry and the way things are we may have a mishap, and something small could be very catastrophic." "We're going to do flight tests when we're ready, not on a scheduled date just to do it on a scheduled date, and the preponderance of evidence is going to drive the decision on whether or not to use it on alert," he said.