SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Taki who wrote (132050)4/28/2004 3:43:42 PM
From: tool dude  Respond to of 150070
 
NO F@CKING COMMENT!



To: Taki who wrote (132050)4/28/2004 3:59:40 PM
From: Taki  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
DNAP.042.Good news 15 minutes ago.PR NEWSWIRE) DNAPrint's DNAWitness(TM) Technology Tightens Net on UK Rapist
DNAPrint's DNAWitness(TM) Technology Tightens Net on UK Rapist

SARASOTA, Fla., April 28 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- DNAPrint genomics
(OTC Bulletin Board: DNAP) (DNAP) of Sarasota, FL confirmed that the United
Kingdom's New Scotland Yard and London's Metropolitan Police have
strategically employed its proprietary DNAWitness(TM) test.
The genomics test was used as part of a 12-year investigation focused on a
serial rapist who has committed over 80 attacks on mostly elderly victims.
The case is still unresolved. Ongoing research at DNAPrint(TM) has resulted
in a substantial enhancement of the power of DNAWitness(TM) as an
investigative tool.
Metropolitan Police Detectives said the test gave them their biggest lead
yet in a 12-year hunt for a serial sex attacker who preys on elderly women.
"After 12 years we feel this is a major breakthrough and are confident that
the new DNA results should lead us to the suspect or even his relatives,"
Detective Superintendent Simon Morgan of London's Metropolitan Police told
reporters on Tuesday.
For the full story see: uk.news.yahoo.com.
"Earlier this year we announced our new product, DNAWitness(TM), and since
then the product has been used on nearly 40 cases," said Richard Gabriel, CEO
and President of DNAPrint(TM). "The fact is that we are not permitted to
discuss any of these cases with the media, and so the importance of our
contributions often goes unnoticed by the public. When a particular group
such as the London Metropolitan Police and New Scotland Yard give us
permission to discuss our involvement, it should signal to the rest of the law
enforcement community, worldwide, that DNAWitness(TM) is a viable source of
new information on crimes," he said.
As a presumptive test, DNAWitness(TM) can be used on other crimes such as
burglary, robbery, assault, battery, murder and other felony crimes -- as long
as a biological specimen (such as blood, semen, saliva or hair) was left at
the scene. Florida had 26,000 aggravated rapes last year, and samples were
collected from most every one, but the samples sit on shelves for years when
they could be used to paint profiles of the rapists. DNAPrint(TM) would like
every patrol car in the near future to carry a DNAWitness(TM) crime scene kit.
Mr. Gabriel continued, "Patterns could be uncovered, eye-witness leads
prioritized, and social and geographical links established that might lead to
apprehensions, and prevent further harm to unsuspecting individuals. However,
most states do not use their resources to even process these kits for standard
(low tech) DNA testing, which is always the first DNA test performed. Those
that do use our technology in the U.S. are often prevented from publicizing
their profiles. This is unfortunate because publication of the profile often
results in new leads. We have learned that there are countless frustrated
and hard working investigators that want to use our new technology but don't
have the funds available to them, and who want to publicize their profiles but
cannot. Law enforcement and prosecutors now have additional tools to hunt
down and jail these criminals, and it would be in all of our interests that
they be more widely used. DNAWitness(TM) is not a panacea, but it is another
tool, and it's available now. And that new tool, coupled with good old
fashioned detective work, will help get repeat offenders off our streets."

About DNAPrint genomics, Inc.
DNAPrint genomics Inc. uses proprietary human genome research methods to
develop genomic-based services and products. The Company introduced
ANCESTRYbyDNA(TM) in the consumer market and DNAWitness(TM) in the forensic
market in 2003. DNAPrint(TM) is developing products in the pharmacogenomic
market and has a disease gene discovery program. The Company is traded on the
Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol: DNAP. For more information
about the company, please visit www.dnaprint.com.
DNAWitness(TM) is a DNAPrint genomics, Inc. proprietary product and FREE
collection kits can be ordered from Lynn Peavey - crime scene supplies
Forensic Innovations for Law Enforcement and Laboratories 1-800-255-6499,
800-255-6499 (C) Copyright 2003 Lynn Peavey Company.
lynnpeavey.com or from DNAPrint(TM) directly
1-941-366-3400 dnaprint.com.

All statements in this press release that are not historical are forward-
looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act as amended. Such statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected, including, but not limited to, uncertainties relating to
technologies, product development, manufacturing, market acceptance, cost and
pricing of DNAPrint's products, dependence on collaborations and partners,
regulatory approvals, competition, intellectual property of others, and patent
protection and litigation. DNAPrint genomics, Inc. expressly disclaims any
obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any
forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in
DNAPrint's expectations with regard thereto or any change in events,
conditions, or circumstances on which any such statements are based.

Media and Press Contacts
Richard Gabriel
DNAPrint Genomics, Inc.CEO/President(941) 366-3400

SOURCE DNAPrint Genomics, Inc.
-0- 04/28/2004
/CONTACT: Richard Gabriel, CEO and President, DNAPrint Genomics,
+1-941-366-3400/
/Web site: dnaprint.com /
(DNAP)

CO: DNAPrint Genomics, Inc.
ST: Florida
IN: MTC OTC
SU:



To: Taki who wrote (132050)4/28/2004 4:06:29 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
TAKI, HERE IS ONE OF THE PROMOTERS mary.cc

TRIMFAST AND INSIDERSTREET.COM WHERE TWO OF THE STOCKS.

MAYBE YOU HAVE HEARD OF THAT PROMOTER

A ELEPHANT NEVER FORGETS

Frank Goelo, being first duly sworn upon oath, state as follows:
I am a shareholder of Ziasun, traded as ZSUN. This is a summary of my experiences of ZSUN and it's Bashers.
I have been an investor in ZSUN since early this year, making my original purchase at $9.62, pre-split. As soon as ZSUN had a price run, it began to attract bashers who spent countless hours trying to destroy the credibility of the stock, using a variety of methods, including in my opinion: lies, misrepresentations, innuendoes, threats of legal proceedings against other Posters, including me, etc. One of the most prolific of these negative posters was Flodyie, posting on Silicon Investor, who also posts as Truthseeker on Raging Bull.

I used to post vigorously on Silicon Investor, in an effort to counter what I believe to be their false and unfounded statements. I found myself overrun by a virtual tide of Bashing Posts from such people as: Flodyie Shneider, CM Burns, Auric Goldfinger, Trader14U, Realmoney, JJS64 etc. I eventually gave up posting positive and accurate information in disgust, as my strong faith in the stock had begun to be undermined under the sheer quantity of their so called "evidence" to the effect that ZSUN was a "Scam" run by a "Bunch of Crooks" in business to line their pockets to the detriment of shareholders. I became concerned that even though i knew of no basis for their statements, other potential investors would not know that, and they would create a cloud over the stock.

In the end, no longer knowing what to believe, I considerably reduced my position from 8000 shares to my present 500 shares. I am awaiting acceptance of Ziasun's form 10SB to potentially increase my stake again, as it would prove that the bashers allegations were wrong. In the iterim, the volume of negative postings is too great to counter by simply posting the truth.

Dated this 30th of November, 1999
Frank Goelo
Notarized in the Caymans.

=============================================

U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 18088 / APRIL 14, 2003
SEC V. SIERRA BROKERAGE SERVICES, INC., RICHARD GEIGER, JEFFREY A. RICHARDSON, AARON TSAI, MICHAEL E. MARKOW, GLOBAL GUARANTEE CORPORATION, FRANCOIS GOELO, YONGZHI YANG, K&J CONSULTING, LIMITED, KE LUO, M&M MANAGEMENT, LIMITED, JEROME B. ARMSTRONG, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Civil Action No. CV03-326 (S.D. Ohio)

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") today filed a civil action against eight individuals and four entities for their conduct between April 1999 and July 2000 relating to the price manipulation, unregistered sales, unreported stock ownership, and touting of securities issued by BluePoint Linux Software Corporation ("BluePoint"), a publicly-traded company located in Evansville, Indiana.

The Commission's complaint, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, alleges that Aaron Tsai ("Tsai") formed a shell company called MAS Acquisition XI Corporation in 1996 and made false filings with the Commission to conceal his true ownership and control of MAS shares and to make it appear that the shares could be later sold without a registration statement in effect. According to the Complaint, on February 17, 2000, MAS acquired a Chinese Linux company and changed its name to BluePoint. On the same day, Michael Markow ("Markow") and his company Global Guarantee Corporation, Francois Goelo ("Goelo"), Yongzhi Yang and his company, K&J Consulting, Ltd., and Ke Luo and his company, M&M Management, Ltd. (collectively, the "Promoter Defendants") bought 3.75 million shares from Tsai for $250,000, or a little more than $0.06 per share. The Commission alleges that the Promoter Defendants acquired over 90% of BluePoint publicly traded shares without reporting their ownership in any Commission filing.

The Commission further alleges that the Promoter Defendants along with the participation of Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc. ("Sierra") and its two employees, Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson, (collectively, the "Broker-dealer Defendants") worked in concert to create artificial trading activity and to manipulate the share price of BluePoint from $6 to a high price of $21 on the first day that BluePoint shares were traded on March 6, 2001. The Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants dominated and control the BluePoint market that day. At all relevant times, Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra and Richardson sold or offered to sell shares in BluePoint without a registration statement in effect, and Tsai and the Promoter Defendants never reported their sales of BluePoint securities and the change in their ownership.

The Commission also alleges that Jerome Armstrong engaged in illegal touting of BluePoint on March 6 and after because he promoted BluePoint on the Raging Bull internet site, which carried hundreds of posts about BluePoint without disclosing the compensation he received from Markow and Goelo in return for his posts.

The Commission has charged: (1) Tsai, the Promoter Defendants, Sierra, and Richardson with violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act"); (2) the Promoter Defendants and Broker-dealer Defendants with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; or in the alternative, Markow and Global Guarantee Corporation with aiding and abetting the other Promoter Defendants' violations of these provisions; (3) Sierra with violating Section 15(c)(1) of the Exchange Act and Richard Geiger and Jeffrey Richardson with aiding and abetting that violation; (4) Armstrong with violating Section 17(b) of the Securities Act; (5) the Promoter Defendants with violating Sections 13(d)(1), 13(d)(2), and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a), 13d-2(a), and 16a-3 thereunder, and Tsai with violating Sections 13(d)(1) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 13d-1(a) and 16a-3 thereunder. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties from all defendants.

SEC Complaint in this matter

sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 04/14/2003