Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (41331)	4/28/2004 11:32:53 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793846

I am posting this because of the excellent Kerry/Dole comparison. Buyer's Remorse By Jay on Campaign 2004 Jay Reding Blog I meant to link to this earlier, but I wasn't able to get around to it. The Village Voice argues that John Kerry needs to go. Of course, it's a bit late for that now - despite all the theories that Hilary Clinton will swoop in like some Chanel-clad deus ex machina at the convention. I think that the comparisons of John Kerry and Bob Dole are quite apt. Dole was a war hero who ran against a popular yet polarizing incumbant in a time when the opposition party carried a vicious sense of partisanship. Dole spent all his time either attacking Clinton or trying to dodge some question about his own record - he barely had time to get a word in edgewise about what he stood for other than not being Bill Clinton. He also lost by a decent margin. Based on what we're seeing at this point, I'd guess that unless John Kerry completely fires his advisers and changes his message he's headed for the same fate as Dole. The Kerry message is based on his war record and his hatred of Bush. That's not enough. He has to tell the 10% of swing voters that will decide this election why they should vote for Kerry rather than Bush. Unless someone shares the same visceral hatred of Bush that the Democrats have, they've little reason to vote for Kerry. Kerry also faces the perfect storm of events seeking to sweep over his campaign. The economy is rebounding, undercutting his economic arguments. His inability to articulate a cogent position on Iraq has negated any negative momentum against Bush on that issue. He's rapidly running out of things to run on, and can only hope that something goes very wrong between now and November. In the interim, the spotlight will be off Kerry and on Bill Clinton for a good month leading up to the Boston Democratic Convention when his memoirs come out in late June - given Clinton's divisive position in American politics it almost makes one think that Kerry is just a fall guy for Hilary in 2008. However, Glenn Reynolds is also right that the Republicans shouldn't get cocky and assume that the rest of the election will be as bad for Kerry as recent days have been. At the same time, if the dynamics of this election don't dramatically change - if Kerry isn't personally anointed by God or Bush caught eating a puppy, it doesn't look good for Kerry. Given that Kerry got the nomination because of his perception of electability, I wouldn't be blaming the Democrats for a nasty case of buyer's remorse.

To: LindyBill who wrote (41331)	4/29/2004 1:59:24 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793846

Annan warns against violence in Iraq Thu 29 April, 2004 04:16 KLP Note: ...Where in the heck was Annan when Saddam was murdering hundreds of thousands of his own people? "Violent military action by an occupying power against inhabitants of an occupied country will only make matters worse." U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan By Evelyn Leopold reuters.co.uk