SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elsewhere who wrote (41355)4/29/2004 3:31:31 AM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
Come on JJ. This article hardly covered any of the bribes,
corruption & widespread abuse. This was a puff piece at best.

The article you linked started off this way.....

Secretary General Kofi Annan struck back today at critics of the United Nations and his leadership, saying they were treating unproven charges as facts and ignoring the good that the oil-for- food program had done for individual Iraqis despite its scandal-ridden management.


The NYT continues to defend the Oil-for-Bribes/Palaces/Illegal
Weapons scandal for the first seven paragraphs before the
first minor hint of what has been widely reported.....

According to the General Accounting Office, the investigative arm of the United States Congress, Saddam Hussein's government skimmed $10.1 billion from the $67 billion program.

Then it goes right back to defending the UN, France,
Russia & those other liars & crooks.



To: Elsewhere who wrote (41355)4/29/2004 4:49:35 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
The "liberal media" do cover it. Here's a NYT headline:

They are covering it with what amounts to wire service rewrites, JJ. The WSJ put some investigative reporters on this and are responsible, in part, for it going forward. The story is now getting so hot the Times will have to do the same.

The Safire column is independent of the Times. They don't control or edit what he writes.