Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HairBall who wrote (3921)	5/1/2004 11:04:11 PM
From: LPS5	Respond to of 4711

Personally I’ve always found your pompous intellectual buffoonery to be nothing less than boring. I think that you've outlined both "pompous[ness]" and "buffoonery" with this haughty post... Message 20075191 ...especially considered within the context of the spelling and grammar dementia that infects, chronically, your haphazard, novice posts. Again, I cite: Message 20076863 As for "intellectual" - certainly. I'm glad you see it that way. So, say what you will in your response to this post, but I have wasted enough time in this exchange with you. So, as I expected, there is to be no response to this question, posed in the previous post? ***** ...[L]et me know what your redneck argot would replace "tails" with in the following sentence... "...Nothing like standing waist deep in the fat, unloved-but-juicy tails of probability." ...and "easily" with in this sentence: "Argumentatively, he qualifies as the lowest-hanging, easily plucked fruit." Message 20078241 *** You define weakness. Have you no shame? No pride? None, whatsoever? You will have to find someone else to which** [sic] to carry on your usual self-aggrandizing repartee... Someone else "to which" to carry on...? ROFL! Are you suggesting that you may, in your monumentally and singularly cowardly fashion, resurrect your secondary alias, ibg? Message 15233298 Message 15233491 Message 15445285 LPS5