SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The TRUTH About John Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (1201)4/30/2004 11:31:39 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 1483
 
tonto, I'm sure Kerry is very vain. I also have to believe the botox treatment rumors are in fact true.



To: tonto who wrote (1201)4/30/2004 11:34:40 AM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 1483
 
John Kerry: Let’s Turn the Spotlight on the “Phony Controversy”

April 28, 2004

by Frank Salvato

John Kerry likes to shine the spotlight away from one of the larger issues in this presidential campaign, whether or not he has a problem with credibility. The credibility flap-de-jour (sorry, that was French wasn’t it) is whether or not he tossed his medals over the White House fence back in 1971. But the real problem isn’t as mundane as what he did or didn’t toss over a fence, at issue is whether he possesses credibility, integrity. So far, I’m not sure I have seen any.

The Kerry campaign has gone to great lengths to slap the “there’s a question about his credibility” label on President Bush. In the early days of the campaign they rallied around the WMD issue, proclaiming the president “led us into war by overstating the facts about WMD.” They hammered on this issue hoping the electorate would forget that everyone else in the world held the same intelligence as the truth. As the facts about the intelligence deficiencies came to light even those firmly placed in the Kerry camp allowed the issue to die realizing that anyone in President Bush’s position more than likely would’ve done the same thing given the same information and circumstances. Remember, Kerry voted to authorize the president to use force based on that same information.

Then we had the quasi-slanderous attack on the president’s service record. The Kerry campaign claimed President Bush hadn’t served honorably in the Texas Air National Guard despite the fact he possessed an honorable discharge. Terry McAuliffe even went so far as to say the president went AWOL. But after all was said and done, and after President Bush willingly released all of his service records – something Kerry hasn’t done completely – this issue too was found to be inconsequential, born out of the divisive nature of the Kerry campaign’s politics.

These two issues alone could spark great debate over Kerry’s credibility. He raised two issues that he knew harbored no merit before he went public with the accusations yet he did so anyway, all for political gain. I believe we could’ve swallowed all of the afore mentioned, chalking it all up to election year politics and the heatedly partisan climate of our political system and it probably wouldn’t have affected Kerry at all. But, most likely to Kerry’s dismay, there is more.

The credibility issue-de-jour, or “phony controversy” as Kerry is calling it, is whether or not he threw his medals over the White House fence in 1971. Kerry went on Good Morning America and proclaimed he only threw some of his ribbons over the fence and that he tossed another disgruntled veteran’s medals over the fence for him. This is reiterated on Kerry’s campaign website. But on November 6th, 1971, Kerry said something quite different. During an interview with a television station Kerry proclaimed he, "gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine medals." When the interviewer asked about his Purple Hearts and Silver Star Kerry said, "Above that, I gave my others," – not someone else’s but his. Yesterday he said he "gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine medals," today he says he only “gave back” a few of his ribbons. I suppose it’s a good thing for us Kerry’s statements are on the media record or perhaps we would’ve never gotten to the bottom of that one.

Then we have the SUV matter. Kerry told supporters at a Houston "Earth Day" rally he truly disliked gas-guzzling SUV’s because they were poor for the environment. Because of that he once proposed a 50-cent gas tax increase (hmm…tax increase). But when asked by reporters about the SUV parked in his driveway he responded that he doesn’t “own an SUV.” He went on to say, "The family has the SUV. I don't have it." He states this in light of the fact his “family” owns not only the 1995 Chevrolet Suburban in question but a 1993 Land Rover Defender, a 1989 Jeep Cherokee, a 1994 Jeep Grand Cherokee and a 2001 Audi Allroad as well. I guess it’s okay to hate SUV’s as much as Kerry does and not have a problem with five of them belonging to your "family" but it doesn’t speak well for someone who wants to be viewed as credible.

Yet another credibility issue facing John Kerry has to do with the $87 billion appropriation for the efforts currently underway in Iraq. Every major media outlet has Kerry saying, “I actually did vote for the $87 billion, before I voted against it.” Kerry contends he voted for the $87 billion appropriation simply by stating he would have supported the bill if repealing a portion of the Bush tax cuts had financed it. Kerry made that proposal in an amendment he cosponsored; the Senate rejected the amendment before approving the $87 billion – a supplemental appropriation that included funding for body armor. The truth of the matter is Kerry voted yes for an amendment to the $87 billion appropriation bill and no on the actual bill. Where he voted “yea” for the $87 billion has yet to been seen.

As I said, the issue at hand isn’t as mundane as whether Kerry threw his ribbons or medals (or someone else’s), owns an SUV or whether he voted yes before voting no. The real and more disturbing issue at hand is Kerry’s absolute need to be on both sides of every issue. His addiction to this balance/counter-balance approach to every issue – and his voting record is full of it (no pun intended) – brings up a very valid concern about his credibility. Can he be trusted to take a stand on an issue? Can he be trusted to keep his word both to our citizenry and the governments of the world? Can he be trusted to see tough issues like the War on Terror through to completion? These are all matters of credibility. Kerry’s is questionable, to say the least. And that, dear readers, is not a phony controversy.

mensnewsdaily.com



To: tonto who wrote (1201)4/30/2004 2:05:07 PM
From: JakeStraw  Respond to of 1483
 
One Fence, Nine Medals, Four Kerrys

by Ingrid Langsather

Posted Apr 30, 2004




ABC News recently uncovered tape from a November 1971 interview that John Kerry gave to "Viewpoints," a program on WRC-TV in Washington, D.C. It showed Kerry saying he "gave back" up to nine medals of his own on April 23 of that year when, as leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War, he joined a group that tossed their war medals over a fence at the U.S. Capitol.

But when Kerry ran for the U.S. Senate in 1984, his story about the medals began to change. He then admitted he had tossed away only his ribbons in 1971 and that the medals he tossed had actually belonged to two other veterans. This has been his story between then until now.

Last Friday, April 23--before the 1971 video clip made news--Kerry assured the Los Angeles Times, "I never implied that I did it," in reference to his tossing his medals away. Kerry maintains his story has been consistent since 1971. Readers can make up their own minds.

KERRY #1: 1971

Host: You're looking at a picture of a veteran who is throwing his medal away.

John Kerry: And that was the medals themselves. And so they decided to give them back to their country and . . .

Host: How many did you give back, John?

Kerry: I gave back, I can't remember, six, seven, eight, nine (inaudible).

Host: Well, you were awarded, the Bronze Star, a Silver Star and three Purple Hearts.

Kerry: Well, and above that, I gave back my others.

--"Viewpoints," WRC-TV
Nov. 6, 1971

KERRY #2: 1985

"Some criticized him for being unpatriotic when he made a flamboyant show during a Washington war protest of throwing his medals away. When, last year, he acknowledged that he had discarded someone else's, he was crucified for being a hypocrite. 'It's such a personal thing,' he says. 'They're my medals. I'll do what I want with them. And there shouldn't be any expectations about them. It shouldn't be a measurement of anything. People say, "You didn't throw you medals away." Who said I had to? And why should I? It's my business. I did not want to throw my medals away.'"

--The Washington Post
Feb. 21, 1985

KERRY #3: 1996

"[I]n a speech immediately afterward to the veterans, Kerry said: 'This administration forced us to return our medals....' But as it later turned out, the medals Kerry threw were not his own. In his recent interview with the Globe, Kerry added a new twist.

"He says that the two sets of medals he threw had been handed to him by a wounded veteran in a New York VA hospital and by a World War II veteran from Lincoln, Mass., whom he'd met at a fund-raiser. Kerry says he can't remember their names. While he did not throw his own medals (they remain tucked away in a desk at his home in Boston), Kerry says he did throw the ribbons on his uniform that symbolized the medals he had earned. Asked why he didn't bring his own medals to throw since it was planned weeks in advance, Kerry said it was because he 'didn't have time to go home (to New York) and get them.'"

--The Boston Globe
Oct. 6, 1996

KERRY #4: TODAY

Charles Gibson: Well, Senator, I, I was there 33 years ago. I-I saw you throw medals over the fence and we didn't find out 'til later that those were--

Kerry: No, you didn't see me throw. Wrong.

Gibson: --those were someone's medals.

Kerry: Charlie, Charlie, you're wrong. That is not what happened. I threw my ribbons across. And all you have to do is go back and find the file footage.

Gibson: And someone else's medals? And someone else's medals, correct?

Kerry: Later, after, excuse me. Excuse me, Charlie. After the ceremony was over, I had a Bronze Star and a Purple Heart given to me, one Purple Heart by a VA in New York and the Bronze Star by an older veteran on World War II in Massachusetts.

Gibson: But, but--

Kerry: And I threw them over 'cause they asked me to. I never, never--

Gibson: But, Senator, let me, let me come back to this, the thing you just said is that the military makes no distinction--

Kerry: This is a phony controversy.

Gibson: --that the, that the military makes no distinction, that the military makes no distinction between ribbons and medals, but you're the one who made the distinction. In 1984--

Kerry: No. We made no distinction back then, Charlie. We made no distinction in 1971.

Gibson: But, but 1984, Senator, I, I don't want to argue with you--

Kerry: Correct.

Gibson: I just want to question. In 1984 . . . when you were running for the Senate . . .that was the first time that you called someone in from labor because they were upset that you had thrown ribbons away.

Kerry: No, someone from labor--

Gibson: You, you called them in and you made the distinction and said, I didn't throw my medals away, I just threw the ribbons away. You made the distinction.

Kerry: I was asked specifically in greater detail about what took place. And I answered the question truthfully. Which was exactly consistent with what happened in 1971. I mean, Charlie, go back and get the file footage…

Gibson: Is it not fair to draw the inference that when trying to appeal to the anti-war people in 1971, you said, as in that interview, it was the medals, and then when the people who supported the war were giving you political problems, you then said, no, I didn't throw the medals away 13 years later.

Kerry: Charlie, that's the most, with all due respect, that's the most ridiculous thing I ever heard. . . .

Gibson: In 1985, you said to the Washington Post, "it is such a personal thing, I did not want to throw my medals away." Then, in 1996, you said to the Boston Globe, "I didn't bring my own medals to throw because I didn't have time to go home and get them." Which one was it? Did you want to throw the medals away or not?

Kerry: That's accurate. I, I've expressed that there was great, sort of, sense of wrenching about the whole thing. Many of us, we had a long argument the night before, Charlie, it's a matter of record, as to how we were going to do it. And the vote was taken. I was not in favor of throwing them over the fence. . . . They voted to throw. I threw my ribbons. I didn't have my medals. It's very simple.

--ABC's "Good Morning America"
April 26, 2004

humaneventsonline.com