SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Enigma who wrote (130653)4/30/2004 3:26:25 PM
From: longnshort  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The cradle of Civilization was in England in 1066. the second cradle was in Philadelphia in 1776



To: Enigma who wrote (130653)4/30/2004 3:41:43 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 281500
 
They get no benefit of the doubt because they shouldn't be there - they are there in violation of international law.

Which international law? Please document...

Hawk



To: Enigma who wrote (130653)4/30/2004 4:28:26 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
Frankly, we could have invaded in self- defense merely for the continual barrages against our aircraft enforcing the "no- fly" zone. In addition, we had UN resolutions to enforce. The UN never, in fact, condemned the operation, in spite of the lack of explicit authorization, for the very good reason that the United States would be expected to deal with Saddam in the long run, and therefore was owed a certain amount of deference in determining the timing of the operation. Additionally, there was precedent for interventions not explicitly sanctioned by the United Nations, not only by the United States, but by countries like France. The most important was our intervention on behalf of Kosovo, which was a NATO operation without UN authorization. The rationale was that instability in Serbia was an inherent security threat to Europe, and therefore expressed an attenuated self- defense justification. In a similar manner, we had a self- defense rationale in invading Iraq, without having been attacked or being under direct threat, given the intelligence that both the Clinton and Bush Administrations were getting on the activities of the Ba'athist regime.



To: Enigma who wrote (130653)4/30/2004 4:30:16 PM
From: FaultLine  Respond to of 281500
 
They get no benefit of the doubt because they shouldn't be there - they are there in violation of international law. Every day I hear the news and think what the hell are Americans doing there killing the people of Iraq. How dare they put a price on a cleric's head? The Americans are the barbarian invasion - in the cradle of civilisation. Over their heads and deep in the shit.

OK, now it's all clear where you are coming from.

--fl