Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (49336)	5/3/2004 12:40:32 AM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

That's a really good question, and I don't have a clue what the answer might be.

To: Taikun who wrote (49336)	5/3/2004 1:52:24 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Good question. I was actually wondering how the entity could even end run the ownership issue this way and remain a beneficial trust. It sure hurt Provident a while back. I was kinda hoping for some buying opportunities :o) Some homework is in order. Edit I never looked into how the Pengrowth situation worked out. EDIT : Now I'm wondering what the rationale would be for trading at a discount ? Would not distributions need to be equivalent. If so why a unit value discount ?