Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jamey who wrote (37207)	5/3/2004 3:23:41 AM
From: Greg or e	Respond to of 39621

If you think hating Jews is going to receive the approval of Jesus, then it is you that is the blasphemer and you are more deeply deceived than I thought. Rather than egg the hate monger on you should instead be rebuking him.

To: Jamey who wrote (37207)	5/3/2004 7:25:42 AM
From: Emile Vidrine	Respond to of 39621

Thanks James. The truth will set men free, and Jesus is the Truth. When the fullness of the Gospel is preached, the world turns against you with a vengeance, but honest men are set free. When a Gospel of compromise is preached, the world loves you, but men remain in their shackles of sin. A Gospel that equates Christ with Buddha, Mohammad and Talmudic Judaism is a Gospel forged in hell. A Gospel that tells men that all can be saved by merely following their own Christless religion, is a Gospel of damnation. Finally, a Gospel that uses the name of Jesus but denies the fulfillment of Messianic prophecies is a Gospel without the Spirit and without the Word. Emile

To: Jamey who wrote (37207)	5/4/2004 1:41:18 PM
From: Emile Vidrine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

Modern Judaism is not the religion of the Bible! Pharisaical rabbis, or pseudo-priests, invented modern Judaism soon after the destruction of the Hebrew Old Testament religion in 70A.D. at the council of Jamnia and imposed their false traditiosn upon the Jewish people. These anti-Christ rabbis fabricated the myth of a secret "oral Torah" secretly deposted with these with these pseudo-priests at Mount Sinai. This cult of pseudo-priets now claimed that this "oral torah" was superior to the written. The authority of this "oral Torah" was used by the rabbinical cult of psudo-priests to subordinate the Jewish people to their authority. N.Y. Times religion reporter Ari Goldman described the basis of the rabbi's authority in the Talmud: "Soloveitchik came from a long line of distinguished Talmudic scholars ... Until his early 20s, he devoted himself almost exclusively to the study of the Talmud ... He came to Yeshiva University's Elchanan Theological Seminary where he remained the pre-eminent teacher in the Talmud ... He held the title of Leib Merkin professor of Talmud ... sitting with his feet crossed in front of a table bearing an open volume of the Talmud." (N.Y. Times, April 10, 1993, p. 38). Nowhere does Goldman refer to Soloveitchik's knowledge of the Bible as the basis for being one of the top world authorities on Jewish law. The rabbi's credentials are all predicated upon his mastery of the Talmud. All other studies are clearly secondary. Britain's Jewish Chronicle of March 26, 1993 states that in religious school (yeshiva), Jews are "devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else." The Jewish Scribes claim the Talmud is partly a collection of traditions Moses gave them in oral form. These had not yet been written down in Jesus' time. Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and those who taught it (Scribes and Pharisees), because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of the Holy Bible. Shmuel Safrai in The Literature of the Sages Part One (p.164), points out that in chapters 4 and 5 of the Talmud's Gittin Tractate, the Talmud nullifes the Biblical teaching concerning money-lending: "Hillel decreed the prozbul for the betterment of the world.' The 'prozbul' is a legal fiction which allows debts to be collected after the Sabbatical year and it was Hillel's intention thereby to overcome the fear that money-lenders had of losing their money."