Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taikun who wrote (49354)	5/3/2004 3:34:31 AM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

OK, I've speculated on this before also (I like trusts). I wasn't aware of ROC discrepancies though and I'm making the rather large assumption that only ownership rights would distinguish the classes. B now is interesting as all the hullaballoo up here has been over unfair tax status for the trusts from corporations. I put forth on another thread that this might be the tack (one in your list Natural Resources) of the government. Seems to me the US listing provides a price premium so while the Canadian government would like a second class I'm less sure management would be as keen. B could also provide motivation if losing an extra 10% since I think one item making these trusts (CanRoys) more popular with Americans has been the Loonie appreciation. Also interesting is more Canadians invest in tax deferred accounts than not so the question of taxes is really moot. ROC is not of use and withdrawals from these plans are basically taxed as earned income. You might want to check out this Stockhouse thread. Quite good for Canadian trusts with energy the flavour de jour. Some very knowledgeable posters. regards Kastel