Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (9959)	5/3/2004 2:29:07 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

how incompetent things were being handled You must understand the founding history of the neocons to realize that some things which appear to be incompetence or bad luck are engineered disasters. The basic strategy they usually use is: 1) Take an inventory of all policies, organizations and department and determine are they run by neocons or providing a benefit disproportionately to neocons. 2) If not, begin critising it, but make extream suggestions or get extremists into influential positions. Critisize more as the situation becomes even more chaotic and inefficient. 3) When the situation is at a point of exasperation have the whole organization, policy, or deptarment reorganized or disbanded with neocon apparachniks in as many roles as possible. 4) Be flexible, keep disrupting many things at the same time and insist upon the urgency so that there is no time for sensible reflection on the solution. 5) *Never pass up the opportunity to use a catelizing event* to force change in many areas at once*. This is a classic neocon tactic brought to the movement by Irving Kristol from his early flirtation with Trotsky. Mix in a little Strauss philosophy on the noble lie* and you have the neocons. I don't really care to read extreme views on either side. This is the mainstream of the Bush administration. Everyone of those PNAC members has a prominant role. TP