Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (41951)	5/4/2004 9:09:46 AM
From: Mary Cluney	Respond to of 793903

<<< agree, we long ago ran out of 'best' solutions in Iraq, and started working on 'least-rotten' solutions. However, I think our current choice is to fight the WOT in Iraq or in New York. I prefer Iraq.>>> We agree that we do not want the war to come here. But I disagree that the choice is between fighting them in Iraq or here at home. I disagree with Paul Wolfowitz, who I believe is the architect of this WOT. I respect Wolfowitz. I think he is a decent person and has good intentions (I don't feel the same way about many of his supporters), but I think he bit off a little bit more than he could chew with his grandiose designs to remake the order in the middle east. Current developments are a disaster - however, I would still rather see Wolfowitz in that office than some other person that Rumsfeld would likely to appoint.