SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (42070)5/4/2004 6:33:52 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 793914
 
Iraqis need another strongman to take reins from U.S.
May 4, 2004

BY DANIEL PIPES - Chicago Sun Times



The battle of will now under way in Fallujah between Iraqis and Americans will, I expect, increase. Further, I predict Iraqis will prevail, and I do so on the basis of two presumptions: Iraqis don't want Americans to rule them, and Iraqis care much more about the future of their country than do Americans.

For the sake of argument, let's assume my reasoning is correct, the U.S. government abandons its goal of ''a free and peaceful Iraq,'' and coalition forces prepare to leave Iraq on less-than-optimal terms. What would then be the least-bad outcome?

Having the central government control the entire country and patrol its borders, contain radical ideologies and ethnic tensions, and not attack neighbors. Further, it would ensure reasonable freedoms, permit the economy and culture to develop, dispatch oil and gas to the outside world, and move toward increased political participation.

Fine, but how to achieve this?

I began arguing a year ago, first on television, then in writing, that Iraq needs ''a democratically minded Iraqi strongman,'' returning to this theme again and again in subsequent months. He would combine several features:

*No history of criminality or atrocities during the Saddam Hussein era;

*No radical ideological beliefs, Islamist, Baathist or other;

*A recognized social standing;

*Access to the tools of power; and

*A power base that is not restricted to the Sunni, Shi'i, or Kurdish populations, making him eligible to become leader of the whole country.

Who might fit these criteria? A high-ranking military officer not incriminated by the previous regime's butchery, someone who could establish working relations with the coalition even as he defies it and works to extrude it and rule Iraq.

Until last week, this was a job description that no one appeared to fit.

Then came the news, at first blush dismaying, that former Maj. Gen. Jassim Mohammed Saleh, 49, a Fallujah native and reportedly a relative of Saddam Hussein, is heading the Fallujah Protective Army, a brand new Iraqi force working with the coalition to help avoid a confrontation between it and insurgents in Fallujah. Consisting of 1,100 volunteers, mostly disgruntled former officers and enlisted soldiers from the Fallujah region, it is tasked with staffing checkpoints and theoretically reports to the U.S. Marines.

As Saleh took command on April 30, the stocky general with a Saddam-style mustache wore his Saddam-era uniform, complete with maroon beret. In a scene broadcast across Iraq, he shook hands with Marine commanders and had the old Iraqi flag raised, to the cheers of onlookers. He set the tone immediately by declaring an intent to impose security and stability in Fallujah ''without the need for the American army, which the people of Fallujah reject.''

As his forces took up position, they celebrated what they saw as a victory over the withdrawing U.S. forces. ''We won,'' exclaimed one of them to the Washington Post. ''We didn't want the Americans to enter the city and we succeeded.''

Saleh seems to be popular in Fallujah, where his arrival met with wide approval. Residents flashed the V-for-victory gesture and mosque P.R. systems gloated over the American retreat. The Associated Press quotes a policeman saying, ''We have very much respect for Gen. Saleh. He was a real officer and is an observant Muslim. He did not harm anyone.''

Saleh has filled many senior positions; one former general recalls him serving as a divisional chief of staff in the Republican Guard, commanding the army's 38th Infantry Division, the whole Iraqi army's infantry forces, and the Al-Quds Army. One of his relatives adds that Saleh was not political and so did not rise in the Baath Party. Indeed, Marine Lt. Col. Brennan Byrne said that Saleh had opposed Saddam's regime and paid a ''steep personal price.''

However, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Richard Myers, said that Saleh ''has not been vetted yet and probably won't be the one in command.'' Later, news came that another ex-major general, Mohammed Latif, would probably replace Salah as head of the Fallujah Protective Army.

This confusion, plus the abrupt appearance of Saleh and Latif, suggests that the race to fill the position of strongman has begun. I cannot predict who will eventually fill it but I can -- sadly -- say that someone of their general description represents the realistic best hope for Iraq.



To: LindyBill who wrote (42070)5/4/2004 12:04:25 PM
From: NickSE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793914
 
Countdown to the oil-for-food document room going up in smoke in.....5....4....3

The United Nations yesterday threw up a stone wall in the oil-for-food scandal, insisting that contracts between the world body and private companies should not be turned over to investigators....in a defiant move that has infuriated probers