SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jamey who wrote (37271)5/5/2004 12:05:00 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
Here is more proof from Jewish publications:

Britain's Jewish Chronicle of March 26, 1993 states that in religious school (yeshiva), Jews are "devoted to the Talmud to the exclusion of everything else." The Jewish Scribes claim the Talmud is partly a collection of traditions Moses gave them in oral form. These had not yet been written down in Jesus' time. Christ condemned the traditions of the Mishnah (early Talmud) and those who taught it (Scribes and Pharisees), because the Talmud nullifies the teachings of the Holy Bible. Shmuel Safrai in The Literature of the Sages Part One (p.164), points out that in chapters 4 and 5 of the Talmud's Gittin Tractate, the Talmud nullifes the Biblical teaching concerning money-lending: "Hillel decreed the prozbul for the betterment of the world.' The 'prozbul' is a legal fiction which allows debts to be collected after the Sabbatical year and it was Hillel's intention thereby to overcome the fear that money-lenders had of losing their money."

The famous warning of Jesus Christ about the tradition of men that voids Scripture (Mark 7:1-13), is in fact, a direct reference to the Talmud, or more specifically, the forerunner of the first part of it, the Mishnah, which existed in oral form during Christ's lifetime, before being committed to writing. Mark. chapter 7, from verse one through thirteen, represents Our Lord's pointed condemnation of the Mishnah.



To: Jamey who wrote (37271)5/5/2004 12:33:43 PM
From: Emile Vidrine  Respond to of 39621
 
"It looks like it would be more commonly known"

The Jewish control of the print media, publishing, and the TV networks over the last 80 years made it possible for Jewish interests to distort our culture and impose upon it a Judeocentric or Talmudic world view. The Internet is changing the dynamics of the information age and breaking this toxic Jewish monopoly over America and the world.

A few years ago we simply did not have access to the full Babylonian Talmud on the Internet. As you know from personal experience by reading my past posts of the years, the Jews attacked me mercilessly when I would dare quote from my personal files and library passages from the Babylonian Talmud. Hal Jordan and Mark Silvers were two among many Jews and Christian-zionist collaborators who attacked me and denied that the Talmud had anything to say about Jesus. Now that we have full access to the Talmud to quote and expose, Hal and his other Jewish and Christian collaborators no longer deny the contents of the Talmud but simply try to say that the teachings of the Talmud no longer apply today and that it is hateful and anti-Semitic to quote from the Talmud. As I proved, this is simply another deception technique of Talmudic Jews. If they were honest, they would simply acknowledge the anti-Christian bigotry, racism and sexual perversion in the Talmud and repudiate it. They don't because they actually support Talmudic Judaism.



To: Jamey who wrote (37271)5/5/2004 4:55:40 PM
From: hal jordan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 39621
 
James, do you actually believe Jews follow and condone the perversion Vidrine believes in? If so, you are as lost as he. I ask you, if this is followed and believed, show me articles in the news of Rabbi's being brought up on charges of molestation. On the contrary, I can show you articles almost every other month of priests being brought up on molestation charges. So who is condoning what here? What religious group needs to clean up their act? I have lots of proof that the church acted wrong and buried charges for decades until it finally came to light. Why is this behavior being condoned in the church?