SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: cnyndwllr who wrote (131623)5/5/2004 5:05:02 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Read Woodward, he did ask, was skeptical, and was reassured by the head of the CIA that the case was solid. The President has to rely on the CIA, just like a salesman has to rely on the mechanic. The President is like the salesman, he's not qualified to look under the hood himself.

In hindsight, I don't think nuke scares were that farfetched. Saddam's own program may not have been as far along as was thought, but we didn't know about AQ Khadr's Sam's Club for Nukes back then. Of course Saddam would have gone shopping, and the only thing that prevented him, the sanctions, was collapsing. If the US hadn't invaded, had backed down, who's to say what toys he would have bought? He had the money, right? He still wanted them, right?