SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (42394)5/6/2004 12:02:03 AM
From: KLP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793745
 
Agree with that, CB....Also, does anyone know who was doing the report, and who leaked it....to the New Yorker for pete's sake....that is odd....

Do we know if all of the pictures were of Iraqi's or were some of them pretending to be...? Am assuming that some of them actually were, as there are several under arrest (six? so far) and a few more cashiered out....(who were they?)

And what about the creep who was a NG guy, decorated before, and taking pictures of our service women there.....

It will be interesting to see what kinds of backgrounds these thugs have...

The investigative report which was leaked to the New Yorker was completed in February, for chrissake.



To: Ilaine who wrote (42394)5/6/2004 5:49:18 AM
From: Ish  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793745
 
<<I don't think it was very wise for Rumsfeld not to let Bush know about Abu Ghraib before he read about it in the newspapers. >>

That was a major blunder. I can see him being replaced soon which should help Bush's poll numbers.