SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NITT who wrote (177797)5/6/2004 11:13:35 AM
From: Robert O  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<<The problem is that you will take away the incentive value of employee options if companies have to cut options because they fear that investors will not understand the value of the options as it relates to motivating a work force.>>

And if we let women vote the whole political system will be far worse off subsequently. Okay, bad example, but you get the idea.

;-)

RO



To: NITT who wrote (177797)5/6/2004 11:22:50 AM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
NITT, RE: Expensing options is all about stopping what many consider big abuses… “fat cats getting rich”.

No, it isn't.

It is all about proper financial statements.

If it was all about stopping the 'big abuses' it wouldn't have been a big priority for the FASB long before the Bubble, when big abuses began to happen in large numbers.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News