SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sam who wrote (131744)5/6/2004 10:59:10 AM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
What you say is true enough.

The problem is that the photos neither give context, nor do they at all demonstrate how extensive the abuse is. The photos do not have to be doctored, as it appears the British photos were. They just have to represent something that was not, in fact, normal to the operation of the prison, like a temporary breakdown in discipline after a major terrorist act, to elicit outrage that may be in excess of the facts.



To: Sam who wrote (131744)5/6/2004 8:52:14 PM
From: Sarmad Y. Hermiz  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
>> As long as the allegations could be plausibly denied, those who want to believe the denials will do so, and those who don't won't.

Sam. Of course. The human rights minister in Iraq said that several times he told Bremer that people were being tortured in prisons by US forces, and he was ignored.

The people here or in the white house who claim that torture and humiliation are not a mandated, directed, systematic tool of the US in iraq are lying. Some of the pictures that came out today are dated from April 2003.

If they want to have credibility, then let them allow unrestricted questioning of the interrogators in an international a court of law. And a UNSC resolution to compel all personnel to testify.

We know that the US Army knew of these tortures for months. They classified the reports "secret" in an attempt to suppress them.

Sarmad