Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Enron Scandal - Unmoderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3003)	5/7/2004 7:12:25 AM
From: Glenn Petersen	Respond to of 3602

Firm Told It May Not Audit Public Companies Denial Is Oversight Board's First washingtonpost.com By Carrie Johnson Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, May 7, 2004; Page E02 The accounting industry's oversight panel has for the first time rejected an audit firm's application to review the books of publicly traded companies. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, created under the landmark 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act to monitor the troubled accounting profession, yesterday said it had "disapproved" the application of James C. Marshall PC, a Scottsdale, Ariz., firm that audited several public clients. As part of its mandate, the oversight board is reviewing and registering all accounting firms with clients who sell stock to the public. Since those reviews began last September, the board has approved 840 audit firms as of this week, while the applications of 143 more firms are pending. The board said Marshall "failed to disclose" in its application that the firm was the subject of a disciplinary proceeding. The panel also cited Marshall's alleged failure to enlist another accountant to provide a second opinion on the firm's work and to keep documents backing up the firm's conclusions. Marshall had promised to take those steps after peer reviewers criticized the firm's record-keeping and other practices in 2000 and 2001. Board member Kayla J. Gillan said in an interview yesterday that the panel bases its decisions on "whether registering [accounting firms] and allowing them access to the public markets is in the best interest of investors." The board looks for negative peer reviews and firms that have been sued over their work, among other factors, Gillan said. James C. Marshall, the president of the company, did not return calls for comment yesterday. He did not appeal the board's decision, a factor that sped up the rejection process. In a November 2001 letter to peer reviewers, Marshall said he and his staff were taking courses to beef up their skills and that a failed merger with another accounting firm had contributed to his documentation problems. In the past three months, at least three of Marshall's former clients, Dstage.com Inc., American Soil Technologies Inc. and Silverado Financial Inc., filed papers with the SEC saying they had hired new auditors. © 2004 The Washington Post Company

To: Glenn Petersen who wrote (3003)	5/7/2004 8:43:56 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3602

Hi Glenn, Re: "Mr. Grasso's name on the plaque was consistent with a N.Y.S.E. tradition to put the name of the presiding chairman when dedicating commemorative plaques. It was not done so for his own aggrandizement.'' Considering that Mr. Grasso was actually party to negotiations with the City concerning the sale of the Brooklyn Bridge, I'm having a difficulty reaching for the proper metaphor for the over-the-top self-dealing that Grasso was engaged in. *** Re: Let Freedom Ring, which encircles a sculpture of the exchange with porticos wrapped in American flags, the plaque, made by Tiffany & Company, symbolizes the pomp and patriotism that Mr. Grasso reveled in. Yet another living example of the wise aphorism that patriotism is the last (and often these day, the first) refuge of the scoundrel.