Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (10228)	5/7/2004 4:52:59 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

He has ADMITTED having WMD and he clearly attacked and/or supported wars in the neighborhood. Same goes for America, plus we used our WMD against civilians. By the way, who did he attack? His use of terror and killing of innocents on Lockerbie and other flights is something that you deny???? It certainly hasn't been proven. Tom

To: rrufff who wrote (10228)	5/7/2004 5:11:10 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20773

His use of terror and killing of innocents on Lockerbie and other flights is something that you deny? You do remember that the bombing of Lybia preceeded the PanAm 103 attack, don't you. The demonization of Qadhafi began with the Reagan Administration, somewhat out of the blue. He had all the usual arab traits, he didn't like Israel, he had oil which he was selling to democrats instead of republicans, and he was proud. The U.S. attacked Lybian boats in the Medeteranian sea, followed by a bomb, perhaps from Lybia in a german nightclub, and then the bombing raid on Qadhafi's tent in which his daughter was killed. The air raid not only did not effectively and efficiently chastise Qadhafi, but it convinced him to take the only known state sponsered attack on an airline, the incident over Lockerbie. Afterwards Reagan gave up (as he did after each counter attack on American forces). en.wikipedia.org