Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: arun gera who wrote (132255)	5/8/2004 4:21:57 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 281500

<<When Saddamm challenged Bush to a debate, there should have been one. >> ??? Never heard about that.

To: arun gera who wrote (132255)	5/8/2004 6:23:30 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

When Saddamm challenged Bush to a debate, there should have been one. That would have been embarrassing when it was revealed that Saddam spoke better English. "The illiteracy level of our children are appalling" --GW Bush

To: arun gera who wrote (132255)	5/8/2004 11:54:37 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

As far as I can see, Iraq was proven guilty in the minds of most americans without even a fair trial. That's one of the most ridiculous statements I've yet heard related to Iraq and Saddam's government.. He was "convicted" in the UNSC and over 17 binding resolutions (judgements/sentences) were entered against him, demanding that he comply.. On top of that, this all started when in invaded a soveriegn country for the purpose of conquest and colonization. He was defeated, his forces expelled from Kuwait, and he was PERMITTED to avoid further punishment (being overthrown) SO LONG as he OBEYED the cease fire accord he agreed to. The very fact that 1441 declared Iraq in material breach was sufficient cause to re-initiate hostilities. Hawk Hawk