SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (86640)5/9/2004 12:33:11 PM
From: SalemsHex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
First of all, there's nothing to support your "millions" claim.

Can you really speak for the estimated million who were killed by Saddam

You mean like we're doing now?

those who were tortured, chemically or physically, raped, plundered and otherwise terrorized?

The world would be better off with lots of other cruel dictators gone as well. What price is too high a price for us to pay to take one dictator out? How many dead Americans is it worth? How much money?

I'm not saying it was the right move but the world is clearly better.

Our relationship with allies and other countries around the world is priceless. We've squandered alot of it. Was that too high a price to pay? The world is in more chaos now than prior to us capturing Saddam.

It's gonna take years and years for us to repair the damage we've done. In terms of how people view us, and in terms of gaining back the trust of our allies.

But, who cares, right? Saddam has been captured. Clearly an excellent trade-off.



To: rrufff who wrote (86640)5/9/2004 2:08:45 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
So is it our responsibility to take out all the Bad Guys in the world, whether they have oil or not?