To: Ilaine who wrote (132469 ) 5/10/2004 3:52:00 PM From: Michelino Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 A lot actually...."A month later, after shooting started, Michael Eisner insisted on meeting with my agent, Ari Emanuel. Eisner was furious that Miramax signed this deal with me. According to Mr. Emanuel, Eisner said he would never let my film be distributed through Disney even though Mr. Eisner had not seen any footage or even read the outline of the film. Eisner told my agent that he did not want to anger Jeb Bush, the governor of Florida. The movie, he believed, would complicate an already complicated situation with current and future Disney projects in Florida, and that many millions of dollars of tax breaks and incentives were at stake.But Michael Eisner did not call Miramax and tell them to stop my film. Not only that, for the next year, SIX MILLION dollars of DISNEY money continued to flow into the production of making my movie. Miramax assured me that there were no distribution problems with my film. " Moore understandably thought that Miramax's continued investments and assurances that distribution would not be a problem were more believable than Eisner's histrionics. Even if every bellicose blog does have its share of believers here, Moore’s statement is surely more credible that your link that “Michael Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt” in which the story that follows the headline contains no admission by Moore of any "stunt". In fact, Moore’s earlier statement that he would post more detail on the while story as time allows, is continuous with the follow-up I quoted. You should read a little more thoroughly next time before you link back the same story to a post that refutes it. (And yes, I linked likewise only to enhance the absurdity. )