SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (132469)5/10/2004 3:52:00 PM
From: Michelino  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
A lot actually...."A month later, after shooting started, Michael Eisner insisted on meeting with my agent, Ari Emanuel. Eisner was furious that Miramax signed this deal with me. According to Mr. Emanuel, Eisner said he would never let my film be distributed through Disney even though Mr. Eisner had not seen any footage or even read the outline of the film. Eisner told my agent that he did not want to anger Jeb Bush, the governor of Florida. The movie, he believed, would complicate an already complicated situation with current and future Disney projects in Florida, and that many millions of dollars of tax breaks and incentives were at stake.

But Michael Eisner did not call Miramax and tell them to stop my film. Not only that, for the next year, SIX MILLION dollars of DISNEY money continued to flow into the production of making my movie. Miramax assured me that there were no distribution problems with my film.
"

Moore understandably thought that Miramax's continued investments and assurances that distribution would not be a problem were more believable than Eisner's histrionics.

Even if every bellicose blog does have its share of believers here, Moore’s statement is surely more credible that your link that “Michael Moore admits Disney 'ban' was a stunt” in which the story that follows the headline contains no admission by Moore of any "stunt". In fact, Moore’s earlier statement that he would post more detail on the while story as time allows, is continuous with the follow-up I quoted.

You should read a little more thoroughly next time before you link back the same story to a post that refutes it. (And yes, I linked likewise only to enhance the absurdity. )



To: Ilaine who wrote (132469)5/19/2004 11:55:14 AM
From: TimF  Respond to of 281500
 
He admits that Eisner told him a year ago that Disney would not distribute the movie. What more is there to say?

If Disney told him yesterday that it wouldn't distribute the movie Disney would be within its rights unless it was somehow contractually bound to distribute the movie and then the offense would be breach of contract not a violation of Moore's freedom of speech.

Tim