Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ish who wrote (43393)	5/10/2004 10:03:03 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793725

I am not talking about replacing Rumsfeld. I am trying to make the point that there have been other military events (in the past) where the troops got out of line or received poor supervision resulting in some " bad news" for the military and criticism by the press. When these events occurred there was no demand that the Secretary of Defense resign like there is going on today. That is my issue. I would not replace Rumsfeld based on everything I currently know. In fact I just signed the Federalist petition supporting him.