Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (10466)	5/11/2004 9:22:24 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

No- I don't ask that you accept it, nor do I call you names for disagreeing- that would be "My way or the highway." Excuse me - you have excluded me from at least one thread without my even posting once to you on that thread. That's your right but I think that goes along with "my way or the highway." I am, however, keeping my own opinion, because I think it is reasonable, and logical, and you have not convinced me that yours is right. See now you get into what Dale posted. "I'm right and you are wrong." You are entitled to your opinion. At some time, common sense has to prevail though to be "moderate" or "liberal" and not "extreme." The conspiracy theorists are neither "liberal" nor "moderate" by any sensible definition. Those who defend OBL, who post that OBL and Al Queda don't even exist, who defend terror, those who blame "victims," those who blame every evil on the US or the one semi-democracy in the Mideast for all troubles, those who see little groups huddling in corners to control the world, are neither "moderate" nor "liberal."