Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (6295)	5/11/2004 11:45:42 AM
From: sea_urchin	Respond to of 20039

Gustave > Radio-controlled?! I'm afraid that doesn't pass Occam's razor Ha! Complex problems have to have simple solutions. > the whole 911 plot didn't even require airliners to be hijacked at all! Yes, I have read your hypothesis before and have thought a great deal about it because it certainly is original. However, despite the razor, which use with great flair on my radio-control idea, and the fact that I do respect your thinking, I have to admit that I believe real airplanes were actually involved. To me, it was not another Houdini trick, like the hijackers. I agree that explosives were used and the buildings were imploded. However, I'm not sure about a mininuke because I am not familiar with what the result of such an enormous explosion would be. I agree that a big explosion/vibration was recorded before the buildings collapsed but I cannot say whether a bomb in the basements would have brought the buildings down a) from their tops and then b) progressively, as would happen with a series of controlled explosions. I cannot account for the pools of molten steel in the basements (? thermite) but nor am I aware if anyone checked out the radioactivity of the site which should have been raised if a nuke was used?