Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (6302)	5/11/2004 2:46:37 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Gustave > Get the picture? Sorry, no. You are using a tautological argument to explain your theory which, in fact, is based on misleading information/disinformation given by the FBI and which, in the light of what we have learnt subsequently, is still incorrect. As far as I am concerned, other than Atta, it was not necessary for "them" to have used any other agent/terrorist/hijacker. The flying school stuff was pure BS and disinformation. Without doubt, only an experienced jet fighter pilot could have performed the turn when plane number two went into the South Tower. That was not done by someone who had only six lessons on a crop sprayer and who did not want to learn how to take-off. So, since it clearly was not possible for any of the supposed hijackers to have flown the plane in the manner it was, another explanation has to be looked for. You have concluded that there were no real planes at all --- what we saw were images --- computer graphics. I contend that the planes were real enough, but that they were radio controlled and not piloted by anyone.