SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (43647)5/11/2004 3:23:48 PM
From: Neeka  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794337
 
Kennedy wants Rumsfeld to be fired and that could only mean bad news for Bush and good news for Kerry in his eyes. You and he apparently disagree.

I'm asking for an explanation, but you consider my post illogical.

Oh well........

M



To: michael97123 who wrote (43647)5/11/2004 3:52:29 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794337
 
"Bush had to act before kennedy and his cohorts piled on. "

I think you are too worried about what the dems will do,
rather than allow Bush to make an informed decision. The
dems are overplaying everything. That energizes their
base, but I think most swing voters will see what the
liberal dems are up to & not like it one bit.

JMHO


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News