SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oral Roberts who wrote (7350)5/12/2004 12:24:28 PM
From: Mark_H  Respond to of 90947
 
2010? I saw a local news story a couple of weeks ago about a town in my state, population of 45,000-50,000, and it was down to one obstetrician. (and he was old enough to retire) I think there were a couple of additional gynecologist in town but they had stopped practicing obstetrics.



To: Oral Roberts who wrote (7350)5/13/2004 8:18:00 AM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
But that will be a good thing. Without OB's, the costs of delivering a child will be much lower and more affordable for everybody. Then, if we could only get rid of hospitals and midwives, the cost would be -- FREE!

LOL

Who is John Galt? -- Ayn Rand


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News