Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moominoid who wrote (49872)	5/12/2004 1:11:36 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Moom, not a local effect <Meanwhile, it's silly to worry about the low risk of a few metres sea level rise over 100 or 200 years compared with the high risk of a 50 metre instant sea level rise due to small size bolides. Local effect which is relevant I agree. > Splashes in the Pacific destroy a LOT. They don't just provide a one-off good wave for some surfers at La Jolla. Taxing oil imports would displace people to using coal, conservation and other ways of life than burning oil, so the net carbon production would reduce, despite a small increase in CO2 from coal burning, plus it would benefit USA producers rather than Saudi terrorists. Mqurice